employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pew Charitable Trusts

Is this your company?

Good for benefits - terrible for everything else - Anonymous employee Pew Charitable Trusts Employee Review

2.0
17 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent. Good location. And work life balance isn’t too bad.

Cons

If you are looking to learn something new or advance in your career, this won’t be the place to do it. Nothing interesting happens here and when it does, it takes 2+ years to happen. Management sucks, too many mundane policies to keep up with, and it feels like work is created just because. The office environment is also rigid and stifling. Plus the extra 3rd day a week does not help.

Explore other reviews about Pew Charitable Trusts

5.0
22 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great and positive work environment, talented colleagues, flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Slow moving and risk averse

2.0
9 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pew offers meaningful opportunities to work on important policy issues, and it has strong resources to support that work. Many colleagues are highly intelligent, capable, and deeply committed to the mission. For people early in their careers or those looking to gain exposure to public policy and research-driven advocacy, Pew can be a valuable place to learn (but not necessarily grow). Benefits are excellent as well.

Cons

The workplace culture is deeply affected by favoritism—advancement and recognition often go to a small, preferred group rather than being based on merit or impact. Rigid processes, layered hierarchy, and risk-averse decision-making make it difficult to innovate or achieve meaningful success. DEI efforts often feel more performative than substantive, with initiatives being quietly diluted or “whitewashed” to avoid political risk under the current administration. While there is a great deal of talent within the organization, the institution as a whole lacks ambition and is often unwilling to push boldly for change. The work environment can be toxic, with sexual and verbal harassment toward younger staff, pervasive microaggressions against people of color, and routine ageist comments. HR does not adequately protect those impacted and instead appears focused on minimizing risk and protecting leadership.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All