Poor salary, poor growth, poor management, crappy office equipment - Designer Publicis Health Employee Review

2.0
4 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly work colleagues when having to be in the office certainly helps

Cons

No career growth, treated like a number rather than a person. No real pay increases, 1.5% in this cost of living situation in the UK is really poor. No decent equipment or space in the office and they want us back in 4 days a week, it is a bit of a big joke to be honest. No one can tell me when i am due a promotion or give me a clear plan. The career conversations we have every year are actually USELESS. Constantly performing above average but getting no recognition or incentive to keep performing well.

avatar
Publicis Health Response
4mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. If you would like to discuss your experience in more detail, please contact a member of our talent team. We would welcome the opportunity to better understand your situation.

Explore other reviews about Publicis Health

5.0
27 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- team morale - salary

Cons

- Time tracking every week - Hybrid

3.0
19 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good benefits in terms of health insurance and flexible PTO

Cons

The company promotes a positive and collaborative culture, but day-to-day operations often feel shaped by a fairly traditional corporate hierarchy and internal politics. There are multiple layers of management involved in project approvals, which can slow down decision making and extend timelines. Budgets can be restrictive, making it challenging to deliver the best possible work, while many projects are assigned deadlines that feel artificially urgent rather than based on realistic planning. As a result, teams often spend more time navigating processes than focusing on meaningful execution and creative problem-solving. Work often felt siloed, despite the company's push for a hybrid return-to-office environment intended to encourage collaboration. Mentorship for creatives new to the pharma industry was limited, which often resulted in unclear direction and a steeper learning curve than necessary. In turn, this could affect project timelines and budgets. At times, it felt like employees were viewed primarily as resources to keep work moving rather than as individuals whose skills and careers were being actively developed through thoughtful guidance and constructive critique.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All