Disorganised, inconsistent and retaliatory when challenged - Software Engineer Riskhub Employee Review

1.0
31 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The technical work has interesting moments and there are capable people within the engineering team. Some colleagues are genuinely good to work with and the office location is convenient.

Cons

My experience was marked by inconsistent leadership, poor communication, lack of trust, excessive micromanagement and monitoring, and coworkers disappearing without any clear communicated reasons. There is a culture where raising concerns feels risky rather than encouraged. Decisions are often implemented with little explanation, meeting times change without notice, and policy shifts are not acknowledged even when contradictory, such as increasing in-office requirements for collaboration while simultaneously cancelling meetings. Processes are unstable and frequently overhauled without clear rationale. Jira workflows and delivery structures change every few months. While the development lifecycle in theory is sound, QA is consistently overloaded, creating delays that ultimately result in developers being blamed for missed timelines rather than systemic bottlenecks being addressed. There are visible double standards in how rules and policies are applied. Sick leave, working from home when unwell have been handled inconsistently across employees. Policies are often reactive and selectively enforced rather than principled and transparent. Role boundaries are unclear. Individuals outside engineering contribute to code and architectural decisions despite formal leadership roles existing. Senior leadership directly edits Jira tickets and adjusts deadlines without communication, undermining accountability and planning. There is no structured progression framework or meaningful investment in professional growth. The culture is delivery focused with little mentorship or support for advancement. Social cliques and favoritism go unaddressed, contributing to an exclusionary environment. The overall atmosphere is one of micromanagement, heavy monitoring, and low trust. Combined with inconsistent communication and at times misleading messaging from management, it creates disengagement rather than motivation. This may suit those comfortable in a highly controlled and politically driven environment, but those seeking transparency, fairness, and professional growth should evaluate carefully.

Explore other reviews about Riskhub

1.0
1 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Office looks nice - Decent food market nearby

Cons

- You will have software on your laptop that takes 900,000 screenshots a month of your machine while working & be flagged for HR intervention if they suspect you aren’t working as hard as they want - Temporary adjustments for additional remote scheduling require gruelling process of interrogation by management and HR while watching favoured employees do whatever they please - Employees will take covert photos of eachother to report to HR - Long standing reputation of mistreating workers on VISA, as the company knows that workers on VISAs are effectively trapped unless they find a new role - CEO actively detests both customers and employees

1
1.0
19 Nov 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- fruit and soft drinks provided

Cons

- extremely toxic and micro manage-y culture with 0 trust policy. Literally run like a school. Software installed onto your laptops which can be monitored by the management to see what's exactly on your screen at any time including how many hours you've been "active". Synonymous with how they haven't been able to hire anyone for 11 months in this current market - less than 50% pass probation. Many people have been let go immediately for random reasons - they have a dedicated hire to monitor your clock in and clock out times along with what hours you are doing and what's on your screen at any time - no flexible working (4 days in office, no ifs, buts or excuses) - engineering level is on the lower side as they struggle to hire good talent due to poor working conditions. They keep hiring external contractors to make up for the hide the lack of competency at senior+ level - deadline driven only. 1:1 meetings are banned to ensure maximum focus

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All