Worst place i ever worked. - Junior Designer SPF Architects Employee Review

1.0
17 Apr 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good local Projects Being involve in many aspect of a project Friendly co workers(exclude managers and owner)

Cons

No life/ work balance (all work) you may work everyday late and some times till morning No respect for employees(they yell and scream at you for even minor stuff) Below average benefits and salary ( you only receive 7 days sick and vacation for first two year) Extremely bad management. You never know when the deadline is or what should be done. you overdo many stuff. No protocol or standard for drawings ( this issue takes you triple time to finish a presentation) There is no value for people here In past 5 month 9 people left this office which proves how tough is working here Uneducated manager( mostly loyal traditional people without enough knowledge) High stress level working under managers No chance to promote. if you are good at modeling or rendering you stuck with that.

Explore other reviews about SPF Architects

5.0
8 Feb 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've really enjoyed my first few months here. It's a great place for people with a self-starter attitude. You will of course be given tasks to perform, but if you feel there's an opportunity area where you can make an impact, your ideas are welcomed and initiative appreciated. I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in opening up their own practice someday. The culture is not corporate at all which is a big plus for me too.

Cons

There is a high standard of rigor in the design and beyond, which is hard at times but great for your career in the balance.

1
1.0
18 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Limited positives that do not outweigh the overall experience.

Cons

This was one of the most psychologically damaging work environments I have experienced. The culture lacked basic psychological safety, accountability, and professional boundaries, creating conditions that were deeply harmful rather than merely challenging. Management reacted with public verbal aggression without first seeking to understand workload, responsibilities, or completed work. Performance was never discussed; instead, conclusions were drawn solely based on what an employee was seen doing at a single moment. Profanity was used publicly in reference to professional licensure study (“ARE”), which is widely regarded as a legitimate and serious part of professional development in this field. The language and tone used crossed basic professional boundaries. When clarification could have resolved the situation, direct supervision chose to align with senior management rather than assess the situation from a fair and objective standpoint, reinforcing the accusation instead of providing context. No meaningful support, accountability, or constructive follow-up was offered afterward. The harm caused was not limited to a single incident. The psychological impact of this environment was severe and difficult to recover from, with effects that extended beyond the workplace itself.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All