SRF has a number of problems due to: (1) inter-departmental communication issues, (2) little desire to change and update processes and platforms in line with industry best practices, and (3) lack of respect for its employees. The company is also very much a good-ol’-boy’s club and women and minorities tend not to be found in very many managerial or executive positions within the company.
Inter-departmental collaboration and communication at SRF is virtually non-existent. The various departments act as little islands and will make design changes, or even complete designs, without checking in with designers in cross-functional departments. This leads to massive cost overruns and morale-depleting working hours as designs are completed in isolation and then re-worked several times on a compressed, high-stress schedule.
Even as technology is rapidly changing the industry, SRF retains a strong aversion to any change to familiar but outdated and time-consuming design processes. Someone else’s Glassdoor review from 2015 states that “advancement is viewed as a threat to long term historic employees who are unwilling to implement change.” In 2019, this still holds true.
Leadership’s actions also show that they care very little about being transparent with and open to listening to their employees. Recently, the leadership team overhauled the benefits package with very little warning and no opportunity to provide feedback. In the process, sick time, which can be converted to vacation time at a 2:1 ratio if left unused, was significantly reduced.
A successful and respectful ESOP runs on transparency and respect for its employees. Leadership’s pointed refusal to involve SRF employees in the decision to reduce benefits could have been forgiven but for the fact that the updated employee handbook actually reduced benefits even further than the changes as outlined in the original benefits change memo. In a blatant attempt to hide this conduct, the link to the benefits change memo was deliberately broken to hide the discrepancy.