Pivot to oblivion - Software Engineer Snorkel AI Employee Review

2.0
1 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good engineering and research talent. Good people to work with. - Decent place to learn about AI, or at least it used to be - Good middle-management, reasonable expectations and perf reviews - Good reputation in industry. Can be a good stepping stone to something else, or as a foot in the door of the AI industry - Cool swag and events

Cons

- Immature executive leadership, letting their Stanford PhD reputations carry them - Despite what they say, they don't care about their people. This is obvious when someone leaves, voluntarily or not. Outside their immediate pod, they tend to just disappear. Only longer tenured employees get a mention, typically in a random Slack message. Otherwise, you find out by suddenly finding them deactivated on Slack without any explanation - Poor strategy and long term decision making. Very slow to react to the rapid swing towards gen-AI, and then it was way too little too late. - Core business, which seemed very promising, dried up - Dramatic pivot to new data as a service direction is not what anyone signed up for, and they're essentially working 9-9-6. Working so intensely, they're doing nothing but creating engineering tech-debt, and never cleaning any of it up. - Super competitive market for new direction, and they're extremely far behind already. Very unlikely they can catch up - Work is uninteresting, just grinding - especially post-pivot - Aimless design efforts

avatar
Snorkel AI Response
1mo
Thank you for the thorough and detailed review. I appreciate how much time you spent on sharing this feedback. The point about how we communicate when people leave is one I want to call out specifically. Acknowledging colleagues with care isn't something that should depend on tenure or proximity to a team, and I appreciate you naming where we've fallen short of that. On strategy and pace: we made a significant bet on where the market was heading, and the path has not been linear. I won't pretend the workload has been easy or light, but I do want our people to feel that the intensity is matched by clarity, recognition, and reasonable boundaries. We're actively reviewing our policies, recognition practices, and how we sequence work so that intensity has limits. On 401(k) and other benefits, we hear you and are evaluating where we can do better. If you're open to it, I'd value a confidential conversation. liz.sweet@snorkel.ai. - Liz Sweet, Chief People Officer

Explore other reviews about Snorkel AI

5.0
14 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High growth startup in an amazing space.

Cons

Startup growing pains, but quickly finding footing.

4.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fast-paced environment at frontier of AI space. Incredible customer list. Really smart, kind, competitive people working their hardest to build something big. Flexible 3-days a week in-office policy which is rare for AI space. Generous benefits package. Actively hiring in lots of departments, feels like resources are coming to help relieve burden of current team who are underwater. The work is interesting, the people are smart and I think this will be a big year of growth for Snorkel.

Cons

Executive team is brand new, and surrounding a founding team that comes from academia and not other successful companies. Lots of growing pains over the last 12 months. Operational struggles and heavy attrition through all the change, but seems to be coming out on the other side with current business momentum. Leadership has a lot of work to do to make work-life balance better for some teams - though this isn't every team.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All