employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

System Planning Corporation

Is this your company?

The job was just so boring and a dead end job, you can’t grow here - Electronic Technician System Planning Corporation Employee Review

1.0
23 Aug 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nothing really maybe location that’s about it….

Cons

Lot’s of Cons: Very poor management, the team was just all over the place not professional at all, the work load was very slow and it was a dead end job, you can’t grow in this company, lack of work and the QA guy was a weird person overall, his looks and his strange personality, he was so annoying, they did boring chassis work, it was just so boring I would sometimes fall asleep on the job, it was not challenging at all, always the same routine over and over, all of the team members were so old, it was so quiet there that if you dropped a penny you can hear it, the stock room lady was strange too, just everything about that company was horrible. There were about 2 people who worked in the team that was normal everyone else was just very strange. I lost interest working there, I couldn’t take it anymore.

Explore other reviews about System Planning Corporation

5.0
23 Feb 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart, talented workforce that's focused on supporting the customer. Team atmosphere.

Cons

Only six holidays and paper timecards

1.0
20 Apr 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

SPC is close to the DARPA with adequate parking and comfortable, well appointed offices. My collogues were both intelligent and congenial. The hours were flexible and jr. management is ameanable to granting limited time-off for doctor appointments, etc.

Cons

Sr. Management does not adequately communicate to the rank & file employees. Most of the communication between sr. management and the employees is verbal. Few orders are given in writing. This frustrates the employees and makes traceability all but impossible. This also promotes employee feelings of ill-will toward Sr. management. Capital expenditures requests, to improve scientific equipment and instruments, were routinely denied. As a result, the scientific equipment is antiquated and largely unmaintained. Sr. management held lavish parties to celebrate contract awards, which came out of the overhead budget. Therefore, Reductions in Force (RIFs) became common place at SPC, which bills itself as a company with low employee turnover. Thus, restricting the number of hours that the employees can charge to overhead. Sr. management routinely ignored reason, observation and logic, and made important business decisions based upon their "gut feelings". Many times this resulted in SPC losing a lucrative government contract to the competition. The salary compensation is below average. The benefits are well below average.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All