The Definition of Greenwashing - Business Development Associate TerraCycle Employee Review

1.0
9 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Tight knit group of colleagues bonded together over the struggle of working at TerraCycle.

Cons

TerraCycle is the definition of greenwashing. Told to sell existing solutions to the marketing departments of large consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies because that department has the money and to avoid procurement and packaging teams completely as they would scrutinise on a technical level and block deals. And rightfully so because very little consumer packaging is ever collected back, it sits in a warehouse for years, and if it ever does get "recycled" it is always very low grade essentially being turned into a different form of garbage. There is never any transparency that you can share with the customer and when hard questions are asked, you simply point to other customers who have bought in and not yet realised they are wasting their money. - Moto is a red flag: To Eliminate The IDEA Of Waste (not actually eliminate waste itself) - KPI: 3-1 (you need to sell 3 times your salary at a minimum to keep your job within 1 year, but buying cycles of CPG's are often much longer than 1 year) - No sales commissions if you are below a manager (this is not standard for sales) - Salary is low - Employees are frustrated, low moral - Overworked for the pay - Median employee tenure is a red flag (low at under 2 years in most regions globally) - Micromanagement from the CEO - Sales decks are 900 slides long (a Tom Szaky special) and all you can do is talk at customers to get through the decks - Programs are to complex for consumers to follow or get involved - Low TerraCycle brand recognition so no one knows about the recycling programs - Collection rates on programs are terrible - Recycling is questionable

Explore other reviews about TerraCycle

5.0
29 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission driven Flexibility (WFH/PTO/Hours etc) Voice is heard and opinion matters

Cons

Demanding pace of play comp is a little on the low side

2.0
10 Apr 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The immediate team is great to work with; essentially, anyone below the VP level is genuinely a good person, and we all share a common goal of wanting to make a positive impact for the majority.

Cons

This company prioritizes appearances over people. Leadership is focused on making things look good for potential buyers, not on supporting employees. When people leave, their roles aren’t replaced — the remaining team is expected to pick up the slack without raises or recognition. Salaries are low, and there's no accountability at the top. They often say 'bring your solutions, we value entrepreneurial spirit,' but ignore input and push poorly planned ideas that lead to failure. There’s also a toxic culture of gaslighting lower-level employees into doing more, without ever questioning if deeper changes are needed. The company has increasingly shifted its focus toward profit and optics, drifting away from its original mission and values. The return-to-office policy highlights this disconnect — lower-level employees are required to badge in so attendance can be tracked, while upper management can negotiate exceptions to this rule. If you're sick or miss a day in-office, you're expected to "make it up" by coming in on a Monday or Friday, even if there is no one around. It’s demoralizing, controlling, and shows a lack of trust in the people actually doing the work.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All