Talented coworkers, but toxic leadership will suffocate you - Anonymous employee The Washington Post Employee Review

1.0
8 July 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented coworkers who care strongly about the mission of supporting independent journalism.

Cons

Context: tech side of the org - C-suite will pay lip service to disruptive innovation and allowing ideas to come from anywhere, but at the end of the day you will realize they always had a pet project in mind and nothing else actually mattered. Furthermore, those ideas will have you saying "...that's what we came up with?" - C-suite & other leadership (in my professional opinion) regularly cherry-pick and misinterpret data, intentionally or not, oftentimes to support the narrative they want. - C-suite can't handle negative feedback or opposing ideas, and has actively chastised employees for speaking up. I have never felt so unsafe using my voice and challenging power, which is ironic at a newspaper. - It's famously difficult to get promoted here. Your career will progress more slowly than you ever thought was possible. - There is so much potential for growth and innovation, but if you stay for long enough you'll realize it's not possible due to the rot and misaligned incentives at the top of the organization.

Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

5.0
12 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

Cons

Nothing bad to say at all tbh

1.0
25 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

Cons

The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All