A solid engineering company held back by bad product managers - Senior Software Engineer Tucows Employee Review

3.0
14 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The strong engineering focus of Tucows makes it really stand out from a lot of other employers. There is a lot to learn and everyone is really happy to share their knowledge. Engineers will get a chance to work with modern architectures and write code that matters.

Cons

The product team is a disaster. I haven't worked with everyone in that department, but I've worked with several and they have a very weak vision for the products, fail to plan in any meaningful way, meddle with engineering decisions, and generally hold back the engineers. A good product manager is worth their weight in gold, but a bad one causes good engineers to leave the company, which is exactly what's happening.

Explore other reviews about Tucows

5.0
27 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people to work with at hover

Cons

I have faced no cons until now

avatar
Tucows Response
1y
Hi there! Thank you for leaving a review. We are happy to hear that you enjoy working at Tucows!
2.0
13 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I was able to accomplish a lot during my time there, and cross-functioning teams that I worked with were always appreciative of my efforts and contributions.

Cons

Colleagues were generally unwilling to help onboard or explain technical details, and there was little interest in taking ownership of the project beyond dictating their preferred approaches. Support for learning or adopting technology was severely lacking, and team contributions to actual development work were non-existent (commit log during this time period can prove this). Discussions often drifted into lengthy debates on theoretical or unrelated technical topics rather than focusing on practical solutions. Overall, it felt like there was more emphasis on control than on genuine teamwork or shared progress. There also seemed to be an ongoing struggle among team members to assert themselves as leaders, with more focus on dictating how they think software should be built and teams should function (with continual emphasis on their expertise and where I sit in the team hierarchy) rather than delivering high-quality software. Even after raising concerns, the toxic atmosphere persisted, as some seemed more interested in positioning themselves as leaders to compensate for their lack of technical ability.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All