Listen to everyone complaining about the bad product team - Software Engineering Manager Tucows Employee Review

3.0
5 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Amazing engineers who do incredible work - Elliot Noss is the real deal, and has fascinating insight into the domains industry - Cool products that have a strong impact on the world - Compensation is mediocre. I make $60k more now, doing the same job. - Benefits are quite good. - Engineering culture is excellent, and everyone in the org is helpful.

Cons

The product team is so far beyond bad it's hard to fathom, and when I left they were digging themselves deeper into the product-driven hole that is alienating engineering from management. The CTO is not strong enough to push back against the product department, especially since their old CPO has become CEO of a subsidiary company. In my 2+ years at Tucows, my single application had 5 or 6 product managers at the same time. Somehow, they thought that one application was 5 or 6 different products but only needed one dev team. What a nightmare. If the product managers were competent, it wouldn't have been so bad. Unfortunately, they completely failed to do anything other than complain that work wasn't done. Myself and my engineering team did all project management and work prioritization because the product team wasn't able to contribute at all. Product managers regularly demanded that certain work should be completed right away, but didn't understand that work depended on other work that they did not want done. The product managers desperately wanted to do engineering work, so they attempted to architect the application themselves and predictably failed to produce anything usable. The same product managers then complained to leadership about the architecture myself and my engineering team created because it didn't match their bad ideas. I should note that our architecture was validated, and what was what we built. Perhaps worst of all, when faced with pressure from sr leadership, the product managers orchestrated an unethical "demo" of a major happy path working, when in fact it didn't work at all and the demo was faked. My engineering team worked for two weeks to fake a demo instead of doing real work. Naturally, the main product manager was promoted and is now in charge of more products than ever before, while my project that he screwed up languished for well over a year after I left. I've heard it's working now. To succeed, Tucows needs to be an engineering-led organization again. At this point, the product team is too ingrained into the culture, so I don't see anything improving.

Explore other reviews about Tucows

5.0
27 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people to work with at hover

Cons

I have faced no cons until now

avatar
Tucows Response
1y
Hi there! Thank you for leaving a review. We are happy to hear that you enjoy working at Tucows!
2.0
13 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I was able to accomplish a lot during my time there, and cross-functioning teams that I worked with were always appreciative of my efforts and contributions.

Cons

Colleagues were generally unwilling to help onboard or explain technical details, and there was little interest in taking ownership of the project beyond dictating their preferred approaches. Support for learning or adopting technology was severely lacking, and team contributions to actual development work were non-existent (commit log during this time period can prove this). Discussions often drifted into lengthy debates on theoretical or unrelated technical topics rather than focusing on practical solutions. Overall, it felt like there was more emphasis on control than on genuine teamwork or shared progress. There also seemed to be an ongoing struggle among team members to assert themselves as leaders, with more focus on dictating how they think software should be built and teams should function (with continual emphasis on their expertise and where I sit in the team hierarchy) rather than delivering high-quality software. Even after raising concerns, the toxic atmosphere persisted, as some seemed more interested in positioning themselves as leaders to compensate for their lack of technical ability.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All