Ulticom's future is bleak - Lead Software Engineer Ulticom Employee Review

2.0
5 July 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible hours, good benefit package. Most engineers are competent and always willing to help. If you are a junior engineer, it is a place to work and learn. For those who are talented and experienced, you will succeed only if you know how to work the process (unfortunately political).

Cons

Lack of vision at senior management to go beyond SS7. Revenue is in constant decline and management is only concerned about benefiting themselves with retention bonus, restricted stock options and bonus that is not tied to the bottom line. There is a constant reshuffling of the same people in the senior management and can be classified at best as a role model for "how to be an incompetent VP". None of these people (VPs) will ever get a job somewhere else with this high salaries. Ulticom is in dire need for new blood and needs to replace their management to grow their business. It has $80 million cash and don't know what to do with it. It is highly likely that Comverse (parent company) will run this company to the ground or sell in pieces.

Explore other reviews about Ulticom

5.0
27 July 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ulticom allows each employee to develop their career as they want. I was able to learn new skill sets and apply them to my position. There was also a lot of flexibility. You could run out to do an errand when you wanted as long as you got your work done nobody bothered you.

Cons

Typically the delivery schedules are very tight causing some stress trying to make sure software is robust within the short timeframe. The worst part was getting acquired by a Mavenir and having our positions transferred to their staff in India.

1.0
26 Dec 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At the working level there is fabulous teamwork, collaboration and support. The benefits are good. The first level managers care about the working level.

Cons

The company mission and vision change every year. The purpose of the business is not enduring. The senior management team does not invest in the people or the company. Revenue has fallen by 15% per year for the last four years and the Pres/CEO has not been held accountable for the deterioration of the company yet the BOD continues to reward him with outrageous bonuses and incentives while salaries for everyone else are frozen at 2007 levels. The profits went to the BOD and COMVERSE rather than being reinvested in the future of the company. This management team would not know innovation if it hit them square between the eyes. Education and training were eliminated when revenue began to drop. The senior management team's management practice is micromanagement. They do not trust people so they direct their actions rather than delegating and empowering them. Consequently people are afraid to take initiative for fear they will be told their choice was wrong. Failure and unwanted results are punished. The Pres/CEO bullies his immediate reports into doing as he wants rather than relying on them to provide guidance and counsel.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All