Pros
Exposure to complex, high-stakes projects with broad implications. Opportunity to operate in an international and cross-functional setting.
Cons
• Leadership often lacked accountability, with strategic blind spots and weak follow-through. • Communication gaps were systemic, with key stakeholders frequently unresponsive or unclear. • Decision-making was inconsistent and, at times, arbitrarily centralized. • Project management was frequently reactive, especially around legal and contractual deliverables. • Collaborative efforts suffered due to shifting expectations and lack of follow-through on team agreements. • Some internal representation relied heavily on external content, raising questions about strategic competence. • Performance evaluations lacked objectivity, often leaving employees in the dark about expectations and development. • Minimal support in conflict resolution or when raising red flags—concerns were often met with silence. • Role clarity was persistently lacking, despite repeated escalations.