A lot of empty talk; mediocre experience - Anonymous employee Vanco Employee Review

3.0
25 Oct 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good employee health plans (but very expensive if you have dependents), stocked snacks, reasonable PTO - about standard for tech industry (20 days, but it doesn't accrue and isn't paid out if you leave), lot of potential in product space.

Cons

Company gives a lot of air time to their focus on culture, but doesn't follow through. Developers - across teams, including on Greenfield projects - are very frustrated and feel they do not have a voice in the organization or freedom to capitalize on opportunities. Product vision continually changes without follow through. Training is difficult to access and poorly managed. Feedback is non-existent. Management has been promising that a career ladder for tech will be made public soon for a year and a half (!) with no progress. Existing staff have taken on increasing responsibility without raises or promotion, while leadership roles remain empty for *very* long stretches. Even things that seem like minor concessions (e.g. a quiet workspace) are denied. Talented coworkers who are still around from before the acquisition and mergers are mostly actively seeking outside positions with plans of leaving soon. Leadership knows their is a morale problem, asks for feedback, but then doesn't listen and moans to themselves that they can't understand why employee satisfaction ratings are so low.

Explore other reviews about Vanco

5.0
11 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with people that really want to make a positive impact internally and externally.

Cons

Vanco is growing which can be uncomfortable, but I have confidence that leadership is doing everything they can to take Vanco to the next level.

2.0
2 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work. Pay and benefits are better than some places. Some genuinely good people scattered throughout who care about their work.

Cons

This place works differently depending on who you are, so let me break it down honestly. Leadership (director level): You can collect a solid salary for a few years before the next purge cycle — which runs about every two to three years. As long as you don't rock the boat and you're connected to whoever's currently in power, you'll be fine. Surviving past your patron's exit requires real political skill and a tolerance for ingratiation. Product: Tends to enjoy the most stability and least turnover. Seems less exposed to the chaos that defines GTM. HR: Relatively safe, despite a shrinking ratio of workers to HR headcount. Rank and file: If you're not trying to move up and can tolerate leadership chaos every few years, it can be an okay place to float. The key is satisfying whoever is currently in charge — not building something long-term, because the next shuffle will likely wipe it out anyway. Once you internalize that, the futility becomes manageable. Builders and fixers: This is who I'd most want to warn. If you're someone who invests, tries to make things better, and believes the next restructure will be different — be careful. I've watched the same patterns reassert themselves through multiple leadership changes. Several of the most capable people I worked with, myself included, stayed too long for the same reason: we kept believing it would change. It didn't. One more structural note: PE ownership has had an exit on the horizon for years. The grow-and-sell strategy has never been cohesive, which has meant an absence of real long-term planning. Little durable value gets built, which ironically makes the favorable sale harder to achieve. Hope for an exit is not a strategy, and it shows in how decisions get made.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All