Great culture and benefits despite corporate growing pains - ISR- Inside Sales Representative Veeam Software Employee Review

4.0
28 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

fast growing company. great culture overall. great benefits

Cons

typical corporate growing pains. implementing new systems without sales input, etc.

avatar
Veeam Software Response
3w
Thank you for the kind words and for your continued commitment to the team in Atlanta — it's genuinely great to hear. We hear you on the growing pains, particularly around rolling out systems without enough input from the sales side. As we scale, making sure the people closest to the work have a voice in those decisions is something we're actively focused on. Your feedback helps us get that right. Thank you for continuing to be part of the Veeam team.

Explore other reviews about Veeam Software

5.0
4 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Cons

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

2.0
3 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Cons

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All