Mass Exit of Employees - Anonymous employee Veeam Software Employee Review

1.0
3 Aug 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent Benefits Close knit teams

Cons

The decline in Veeam's corporate environment has been absolutely astonishing. Leadership and upper management are constantly lying to their employees, handing out false promises and creating an environment that has forced a mass exit in all departments. Even with the mass exits and constant employee feedback there has been zero effort to make changes. Instead they refuse to hire backfills and punish the employees that have chosen to stay with more work, zero promotion or recognition and a lack of even acknowledging that there is a corporate issue. It is obvious they are getting ready to sell and have no interest in the employees that have kept the company's wheels turning. On top of all that, they send out weekly emails of the same revolving upper management who continue to somehow gain promotions while the rest of us suffer.

Explore other reviews about Veeam Software

5.0
4 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Cons

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

2.0
3 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Cons

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All