Growing Pains & Shifting Priorities - Anonymous employee VentureBeat Employee Review

3.0
12 Jan 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The office is located in a great central location that is very easy to get to, the company has made a good name for itself in the valley. The events pull in very high level people, and the news team is a well oiled machine. Tons of talented people who all bring skills well beyond their job duties. Very reasonable working hours and flexibility.

Cons

So. Much. Turnover. There was not a single month that went over without multiple people leaving which is drastic for a 50 person company. Management often felt frantic and unable to pick a clear direction. Priorities would often get catapulted to red alert and then cancelled right before done.

avatar
VentureBeat Response
3y
After this review, Matt Marshall returned to the helm of CEO to revive its journalism core after moving away from its 2015 push into syndicated research. We recognize this did result in loss of employees, but also attracted great talent that was more aligned with our vision and focus. In 2021, VentureBeat implemented a pivot that significantly altered the direction of VB's editorial focus, to serve a readership of enterprise technical decision makers With this shift in focus, VB has moved into an era of profitability and faster growth.

Explore other reviews about VentureBeat

5.0
15 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Big addressable market that has yet to really be tapped into

Cons

Startup vibe and still trying to figure a lot of things out.

1.0
18 June 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are smart, capable individuals doing their best under difficult conditions.

Cons

VentureBeat is defined by a lack of strategic clarity and operational discipline. Priorities shift frequently without explanation, decisions are often made impulsively, and leadership lacks alignment on core goals. Execution suffers as a result, with teams pulled in conflicting directions and no consistent framework to measure success. Processes are either absent or routinely bypassed, creating confusion and inefficiency. Internal communication is fragmented, timelines are unrealistic, and resource planning is inconsistent. What structure does exist is often eroded by last-minute pivots driven by top-down pressure rather than data or long-term thinking. The result is a high-friction environment that discourages focus and sustainability. Talented people burn out quickly, not due to the work itself, but because of the disarray that surrounds it. The place is borderline abusive.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All