Fantastic Company to Work For - Government Relations Specialist Verisk Employee Review

5.0
19 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working at Verisk has been an incredibly rewarding experience. The management team is supportive, transparent and genuinely invested in employees' professional development. Collaboration is seamless thanks to a well-organized, knowledgable and friendly team. The ability to work remotely has been a game-changer, offering flexibility without sacrificing productivity or team connection. Verisk provides all the tools and resources needed to excel in a remote environment while still fostering a strong sense of community and collaboration.

Cons

Honestly, none that come to mind.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thank you for sharing your thoughts about your time at Verisk. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. Your acknowledgment of our culture and supportive colleagues is truly encouraging. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback regarding work-life flexibility and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. Should you have any further feedback or suggestions on how we can continue to improve, please reach out to HR.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All