The Truth About Verisk - Senior Product Designer Verisk Employee Review

5.0
9 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Verisk is pro-family, and pro work-life balance. That means there are a lot of paid time off holidays, and my manager Bethany Walters showed genuine care when I had personal hardships and supported me through them. Leadership genuinely supports personal growth, and I can't speak highly enough of Jonathan Hill. He was one of the best humans I have ever worked with. His passion for research and user needs shows through his work.

Cons

While every product designer pushes to innovate design, Verisk's customers do not share the same sentiment. So customer buy-in and stakeholder buy-in are steep hill to climb. I believe the leadership of UX will win out though and Verisk will surely be known as a leader of innovation in the restoration space.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Greetings! We were so thrilled to read your review. Thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. We believe that a balanced life leads to happier and more productive team members, and we’re delighted that you’ve found our initiatives effective in achieving this balance. Additionally, We are happy to hear that you are pleased with the leadership team. Verisk leaders such as Bethany Walters and Jonathan Hill help us to further live our values of learning, caring, and results.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
1 July 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
30 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All