Poorly Managed Org with an Identity Crisis - Anonymous employee Waterford.org Employee Review

1.0
9 Mar 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible hours, many opportunities to meet new people.

Cons

Pure chaos. Projects constantly compete for attention, too many applications for tracking work in their own ecosystems leads to miscommunication and ridiculous tagging to make other systems work with each other. There is no clear hierarchy for how decisions get made and some teams don't feel empowered to have a voice. In fact, most people here would tell you that they don't think they have a voice at all, so take that how you will. Processes are hardly followed and the organization bleeds money.

Explore other reviews about Waterford.org

5.0
7 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Business trips were paid for and well organized, and it was great working with my colleagues as well as the kids during testing. The pay was actually very high for an intern! I had lots of opportunities to grow, but was not overwhelmed with work. Honestly one of the better places to work I have experienced, and if I were still in the US I would try to work here full time.

Cons

Having a remote team was a bit difficult, and I felt disconnected from my colleagues

2.0
23 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is meaningful: supporting children’s education and uplifting families is work that matters. Dedicated colleagues across many teams who truly care and give their best despite limited resources. Opportunities to take on high-impact projects and build valuable skills. Historically, there have been seasons where collaboration felt strong and progress felt possible.

Cons

Current leadership culture is hostile and dismissive. Leaders undermine, contradict each other, and then hold staff accountable for outcomes made impossible by their own directives. Constant shifting of priorities with little alignment across teams; “moving goalposts” is a common experience. Accountability without authority: staff are often tasked with results without the budget, tools, or decision-making power to succeed. Favoritism and board influence drive decisions more than strategy or expertise. Some leaders openly exclude or undermine colleagues. Micromanagement from the top while simultaneously withholding resources creates a climate of fear, not innovation. HR claims to take employee concerns seriously, but follow-through is minimal — “investigations” are surface-level at best.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All