employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Environment America

Is this your company?

Environment America Reviews

2.5

31% would recommend to a friend

(91 total reviews)
avatar

Margie Alt

34% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

Environment America has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 91 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Environment America employee rating is 33% below average for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

91 reviews
1.0
13 May 2021

Worst cult ever

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you can put up with the numerous problems, it is theoretically possible to build experience and claim credit for the work you do before escaping to greener pastures. But Environment America, which is part of the mothership organization The Public Interest Network, is only suitable for those who are truly desperate and have no other options.

Cons

Abysmal salary and benefits; rampant corruption; flawed ideology; toxic and abusive culture; overt hostility toward incorporation of basic diversity/equity/inclusion/justice principles; idiodic organizational structure; systemic incompetence; and leadership's willful rejection of common-sense improvements that could make this a passable workplace. Environment America (EA) and its parent organization, The Public Interest Network (TPIN), are completely broken. Here is a small sampling of what a job at TPIN looks like: -Entry-level employees are paid the bare minimum of what TPIN can legally get away with in a given state. It is not a living wage, and there is no cost of living adjustment for expensive cities. Pay is slightly higher for more experienced staff, but scales very poorly and is a mere fraction of what other nonprofits pay for similar roles. Senior managers assert that they too have comparably low salaries, though many benefit from multiple TPIN checks by holding multiple roles simultaneously, sitting on boards, etc. Doug Phelps, CEO and leader of the TPIN cult, also runs a for-profit canvassing operation that provides some in senior management with additional sources of income. TPIN’s non-profit resources are frequently used to subsidize this for-profit operation. -New employees do not receive a written offer letter, only a verbal description of the job and their compensation. It is not unusual for management to spontaneously change an employee's compensation, omit key details of what the employee's job will entail, or renege on previous verbal promises. -On mandatory work trips, employees are forced to share a full-size bed with another adult for up to two weeks. There is no per diem for meals. These periodic trainings and meetings in Denver, Colorado happen 2-4 times per year. New staff are often directed to pay for their own plane ticket without reimbursement. -There is a screening question often used in interviews: "Is it more important to move to a zero carbon society as fast as possible or to make sure our transition to a zero-carbon society is just for all?" Shockingly, picking "just" will be treated as an incorrect answer. Points are deducted. This is one example of the organization's hostility toward environmental justice and its proponents. -There is no Human Resources department. There is no harassment policy. All problems must be directed to one's immediate supervisor, even if the issue in question is with that supervisor. EA and TPIN's parasitic business model is to recruit ideological recent graduates who do not yet have the professional perspective to realize how bizarre this workplace truly is. The organization plans for approximately 50% turnover each year. The organization uses this attrition to self-select those who are willing to tolerate the cultish atmosphere. And to be clear: this organization is absolutely a cult. CEO Doug Phelps and his sycophants are holy, and alternate points of view are not tolerated. The organization continues to force employees to share beds because that is the way that Doug Phelps and his college buddies did it. If you don’t like it, then leave. Frighteningly, management maintains an internal "culture fit" blacklist to inventory employees who do not align well enough with the organization’s prevalent conservative ideology. TPIN monitors employees’ personal social media accounts to identify sympathizers of Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, and adds employees to the blacklist if they “like” or “retweet” content affirming the Movement for Black Lives. Management uses this blacklist for all major decisions: whom they promote, whom they invite to join the board, and whom they terminate. Employees who have fully bought into the cult are asked to spy on other employees, and their reports are used to further inform the blacklist. This organization is toxic. If you have any other options, do not take a job at Environment America.

2.0
8 Dec 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You will get to take on projects and responsibilities that essentially nobody else gets to take without any experience. In the 4 months I've worked with EA, I've run 5 press conferences, been published in almost a dozen newspapers, lobbied a U.S. Senator, 1 U.S. Representative, and 3 other Representatives' staffs, and over a dozen State Representatives' and Senators' staffs.

Cons

Terrible pay - it's the minimum for white collar (with the exception of in NY and CA, where the salary is higher), which is lower than the hourly minimum wage by 30-40 dollars per week over the course of the year; that's thousands of dollars per year. Hit or miss "staff director" model - Fellows are paired with experienced Advocates and members of the Field Team, and while I know many who are very happy with their director, many are unsatisfied with theirs. Extremely long hours - at the minimum, expect to work more than 50 hours a week, and during the summer, you'll be working at least 65-70 per week.

2.0
12 Mar 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You will lobby your congressional delegation, you will be on TV, you will get to voice (some of) your views and meet lots of passionate people across the country and in your state. You will also go on an awesome vacation nearly entirely paid for for a week in the winter. Some of the coworkers you meet (mostly canvassers) will be amazing people.

Cons

Ultimately, most fellows don't last for two years or go on to work in the network because there are too many factors making the job unsustainable, even if you're really into it. In a seminar on why the everyone quits, they did a survey. Pay and hours were at the top. You will starting around 24,000 a year for working 50 hrs a week or 80 during the summer as a canvass director. That's fine if you have parents paying your rent, or you enjoy spending 95% of your waking time in the office and enjoy the people you're working with. However, if you're a 20-something with no one supporting you monetarily but yourself it will be difficult to make ends meet. Environment America is about 98% white, and from what I could tell, most people were upper middle to upper class, which makes sense when you consider the pay. The network prides its self on doing things inexpensively, which is great, however, I don't think that should negate paying their employees decently. Getting paid enough to be able to afford car insurance, for example, shouldn't be considered excessive.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 91 Reviews

Glassdoor has 127 Environment America reviews submitted anonymously by Environment America employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Environment America is right for you.