employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Fishers Technology (ID)

Engaged employer

Fishers Technology (ID) Reviews

4.5

89% would recommend to a friend

(136 total reviews)

Christopher Taylor

98% approve of CEO

89% positive business outlook

Fishers Technology (ID) has an employee rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars, based on 136 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Fishers Technology (ID) employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

136 reviews
1.0
15 July 2024

A Cult of Yes-Men (and Women)

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lower level employees are where the culture is at. They stick together, help each other, and are quick to solve problems when they arise. If you're a help desk tech, you'll love your coworkers!

Cons

Where to start? Despite encouraging “healthy conflict,” politicking and scheming run rampant. Promotions are made based on how much of a yes-person you are, and feedback is not taken seriously when it doesn’t align with what management wants for themselves. The few managers who actually care about the employees and the clients (and not just the pocketbooks of themselves and the company) have no power to enact any positive change. Management makes promises they won't keep. I watched Fisher's Technology acquire another, very successful IT support company in one of their markets, only to drive out several of that company's employees over the course of the following year. I watched management and HR both drag their feet on accommodating an employee’s disability. Sure, the “requirements” for the accommodation were thinly veiled behind a need for paperwork, but that accommodation had been in place for an entire year before this paperwork was suddenly requested. Further, the accommodation was in place when that employee was initially onboarded with the company and HR said nothing about it during that time. HR didn’t clear up the matter directly with the employee, but instead colluded with the manager at the employee’s local office to make accommodation difficult. The employee asked for clarification about the need for the aforementioned paperwork, HR simply neglected to respond the employee’s questions at all. When the employee attempted to work remote to accommodate their own disability, their supervisor made it clear they wanted to be made aware of every instance of remote work. (This employee had worked remote many times before with no issue, mind you. The only time it became a problem was in a direct attempt to accommodate their disability with exactly the accommodation that HR was making difficult.) This instance of maltreatment was the last straw in a series of toxic and hostile actions by management which caused the employee to resign their position. The only reason I didn’t make a formal report of this maltreatment directly to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is that the former employee asked me not to do so. I watched an employee get "laid off" after they refused to take over work by the PM who left the company due to the hostile work environment. You see, that PM had briefly trained the laid-off employee on Project Management. When the trainee was told they would not become a PM themself, they stopped training. So, when the actual PM departed and upper management tried to pressure that employee into taking over some of their responsibilities, that employee declined on the grounds that they were not trained. They were "laid off" two weeks later because Fisher's Technology decided that the person's role was no longer necessary at their local office. Fisher's then told those left at the office that they had a plan for that person's responsibilities, only to dump those responsibilities on one of the few decent managers in the company whose plate was already full and who was already severely overworked. Management insists that they’re very discerning about hiring the best, yet when they get the experts they seek, those experts are told to fall in line. Fisher’s will hire experts and then completely disregard their expertise, especially, as I’ve mentioned before, if that expertise conflicts with their own vision for the company. And speaking of the company vision, you’d better be ready to buy into it, completely and mindlessly. I didn’t want to believe the reviews that accused Fisher’s of cult-like behavior, but now that I’ve seen it, I understand what those individuals meant. If you do happen to become dissatisfied for one reason or another, do not show it. Management expects happy employees at all times, even when the company’s own decisions run counter to that. (For example, you should be happy to see your coworkers being abused, as in the accommodation example above.) Show frustration or dissatisfaction, and management will “check in” on you to determine if you can be redirected back to their vaguely cult-like mindset. I could go on, but I've written enough of a novel already. Do not work for this company if you have a moral compass. Do not work for this company if you intend to bring meaningful feedback to your team or if you want to make positive change for the company. Do not work for this company if you are not a yes-person who will agree to everything requested of you without a modicum of critical thinking. Do not work for this company if you want to see your team treated with dignity and respect by the people who manage them.

1.0
23 May 2024

CULTURE

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fisher's has many processes in place to ensure the job gets completed.

Cons

Fisher's prides itself on "culture". However management doesn't really address employee concerns. Instead they collaborate behind the scenes and come up with a game plan all their own that does not match employee or customer retention needs.

1.0
17 Jan 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have a nice ping pong table and serve beer in their break room, you know, because, culture.

Cons

The sunshine and rainbows painted by the leadership team of the Fisher's culture is vastly overstated and appalling at how wrong it is. The teams which work the hardest to improve the quality of service received by the customers are the first ones to be criticized and held to such an arbitrary standard which can never be obtained. The service department is so out of touch with the happiness of its teams and blinded by large egos, it willingly loses great employees... all without batting an eye. Each market, and departments in those markets, are held to such different standards while being treated so differently by the management team, there is almost a hunger games feel to the culture. It is a cutthroat game of who can best who to move up in the graces of the leaderships eyes all while longing for praise in the pointless monthly team meetings. When in all reality, if you aren't apart of the sales team, which is filled with nepotism and favoritism, then you don't matter to anyone in management. The leadership thinks they are in touch with the employees, however, they have no grasp on reality. When the leadership only spends about 5% of their time in the building, they will never have a real idea of where the company stands... not that they care past what revenue the employees bring in for them. The only thing they cares about is doing seminars for other companies to feed their own ego while the company struggles internally. The company and culture used to actually feel like family and it was a pleasure to go to work, but the leadership team did not scale the culture and ruined it with egos. It was hard to see the reality of the environment until actually leaving and looking from the outside in and seeing how miserable the culture really is.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 136 Reviews

Glassdoor has 140 Fishers Technology (ID) reviews submitted anonymously by Fishers Technology (ID) employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Fishers Technology (ID) is right for you.