Foolproof Reviews

3.6

63% would recommend to a friend

(67 total reviews)

Anup Rege

40% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

Foolproof has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 67 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Foolproof employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

67 reviews
4.0
21 Feb 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Draws in inspiring people, excellent practitioners on the whole Fun culture, social Hierarchy structure supports learning from other, more experienced consultants Ideal place for a new grad to learn

Cons

Management debatable at times Promotion and salary reviews appeared biased, based on who was better mates with management than genuine performance, even when evidence is apparent and presentable

2.0
7 Mar 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Generally speaking, everyone is friendly and enjoyable to be around. Hours are reasonable compared to other agencies. You get to sit on a comfortable chair.

Cons

Bloated and self-serving top-down management. Ridiculous structure: intern, junior, mid, senior, principal, head, director. Pay is abysmal. Brown-nosing is encouraged, and effectively rewarded. The work is generally uninspiring. Creativity is trampled on. The practice hasn't really moved on from Steve Krug's 2000 book 'Don't Make Me Think'. Uninspiring vision - 'be the biggest experience design agency in the world'. There is no one in a leadership role who is someone to aspire to.

2.0
22 Apr 2016

Ok if you are a junior

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are many talented people, and the overall UX processes are well defined - this makes foolproof a good place for junior professionals looking to be exposed to decent UX practices, but less adapt for mid-weight and senior professionals looking for challenges.

Cons

The majority of the projects are short and lack breath and ambition. Most of the activities on the research side involve solely testing third party applications, mostly for the finance sector and there is limited opportunity to innovate. Promotions and bonuses are decided more on personal relationship than on merits and achievements. The middle management is heavy and not always able to cope. There are tensions between teams and groups, people are highly competitive and do not like to share information to keep their competitive advantage. High turn over.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 67 Reviews

Glassdoor has 72 Foolproof reviews submitted anonymously by Foolproof employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Foolproof is right for you.