History Associates Reviews

3.6

63% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)

Beth Maser

78% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

History Associates has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The History Associates employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
1.0
14 Sept 2015

Run Away

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The health and dental benefits are very good. You get to travel to repositories around DC and other locations, which offers opportunities for networking. The employees are all extremely friendly and bright.

Cons

There are so many things wrong with this company. The Research Historian pay is insulting to the employees and clients. Entry-level salary is $35,000, which at an hourly rate is a little less than $17 an hour. The company charges clients $78 an hour for the Research Historian, five times more than the salary . Not only are Research Historians paid $10,000 below the national average, there is little promotional opportunity, even for employees who have worked there for 5 to 10 years. Another major issue is management. They are unorganized, unprofessional, and have little to no education in office management, employee training, and ethical working behavior. Entry level employees are trained poorly for one day and then are left at their extremely busy project managers' mercy to learn the company's standards for formatting, note taking, filling out expense reports, etc.. Communication between management and project managers is inadequate. A typical office day consisted of asking project managers for work to do and being told that there was no work and that you should ask a different project manager. After speaking to five different managers who did not have work, the Research Historians would sit at their cubicle and wait until work did come up. When a project manager finally had work, it was photo copying. Morale is extremely low and work is stressful. New and old employees are aware of these conditions; complaints and feedback has been provided to the management, but employee concerns are ignored. 60% of lunch conversation was painfully joking about the salary, working conditions, and inappropriate manager behavior. I once heard an employee say that working for History Associates was like being an abused household wife: you are abused for so long and once you work up the courage to leave, the company offers a small incentive to get you to stay.

1.0
4 Jan 2016

Get started, then get out

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you’re serious about a career in public history, this company is a great, entry-level opportunity. You’ll be exposed to a wide variety of historical work: litigation, exhibition design, interpretive planning, collections management, etc. Not every project will be so exciting, but you’ll always learn something new. There’s also a fair amount of travel required, so every now and then you get free food and time out of the office. Lastly, you’ll work with a wonderfully talented and immensely friendly group of historians and archivists.

Cons

This company seems to specialize in drafting policies that discourage (at worst destroy) any sense of professional development, morale, and fulfillment in its employees. The upper management is made of men better suited for a classroom than a board room. They’re fine historians but have little to no training on best business practices. As much as this company thrives on teamwork, the upper management relishes in keeping to their elite, misguided boys club. The pay is low. Really, really low. The company says that their salary is on par with the professional and regional average. But, the company says a lot of things. Like how standing will kill you, and that’s how the air should smell… In reality, the cost of living in the DC-area gets more expensive each year and the company refuses to catch up. They’ll ignore any reports on the rising costs of living as blatantly as they do health warnings about cigarettes and diet soda. Negotiating any sort of raise or promotion is almost a non-starter. Management is convinced that you’re trying to get something for nothing, so these conversations play out less like a conversation about your professional trajectory and company contributions and more like an interrogation of why you should even be there in the first place. I could go on, but there’s not much to say other than what I and other former employees have already written. The company has created high stress environment with very little pay off. Everyone, from the newest employee to the most seasoned historian, complains about the abuse they’ve endured--it’s a wonder how anyone stays.

3.0
1 June 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

First off, this pertains mainly to the "research" side. History Associates is basically two different companies, only connected at the very top, although there are certain commonalities. Information Resource Management (the "archives" side) is a separate division with its own culture, and its own set of positives and negatives, and I can't speak to those. The other divisions collectively make up the "research" side, and that's where I worked. You get to work with a lot of very smart and talented people who are passionate about history and generally very easy to get along with (there are always exceptions, but not many). There is a good amount of grunt work (like photocopying) when you start, but it's also true that by the time you've been there a year, typically you're already managing projects. The work is challenging, and there's a lot of detective work involved. Since it's a small company, even when you're starting out you often feel connected to the final product. Being small also gives you a good chance to shine when opportunities arise. Of course, you also get to work in your field, which itself may be a bonus (it was for me). You gain experience conducting research at a variety of locations, including distant facilities requiring travel (generally considered one of the job's perks, although the destinations themselves aren't always inspiring). Even if you stay only a couple of years, the experience you gain is likely to serve you well as you progress in both your education and your career.

Cons

The pay isn't great, offset only partially by decent benefits, and to add insult to injury it's located in a terribly expensive area. However the worst part about working there is management, especially the most senior management. Honestly, at times it's like being trapped in some sort of alternate Dilbert universe, except not at all funny. None of the management are trained at being managers. They are all history PhDs, whose management model seems to be some antiquated graduate history department. Most are seriously short on "people skills," and HR is effectively nonexistent (the person you go to for advice and to air grievances is the same one who is responsible for firing you, and appears downright contemptuous of young intellectuals). Many are seriously passive-aggressive. The most awkward part is having to hear long-time employees, many held in high regard, suffer through responding to the CEO as he wanders the halls, asking people if they've "made any money for me today." Seriously, no joke. It's a highly collaborative work environment, but the CEO hates seeing people gathered in groups or talking in hallways (it's not a huge building), and likes to tell people to return to their "carrels" and generally act as if his employees are hapless graduate students, rather than paid professionals. He also insults people freely and publicly, and it's just awkward and unprofessional all around. He, and perhaps some of the other managers, are also absolutely paranoid that you're out to cheat the company. Those attitudes just trickle down and poison everything, and since some people draw his ire more than others (he definitely plays favorites), it creates a horrible work environment. The level of stress and low morale here is unbelievable, and unnecessary.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 32 History Associates reviews submitted anonymously by History Associates employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if History Associates is right for you.