Hive (CA) Reviews

3.3

59% would recommend to a friend

(153 total reviews)

Kevin Guo

63% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

Hive (CA) has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 153 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Hive (CA) employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

153 reviews
1.0
15 Aug 2023

Reconsider.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

junior experience and decent money

Cons

Let me preface this by saying that I understand how the job market is. New grads can't get a job in CS and everyone wants to make six figures in tech in SF. It's true: you will make a good amount of money working here. But if you have any other options - and I mean any at all, I would take some time to really consider what you want. I've heard a lot of people give reasons as to why they joined: work in the AI space, living in San Francisco, join small fast-moving startup. And I will tell you right now that every single one of these people has regretted their decision, because working here is a bigger con than any sort of benefit that you can find at this train wreck of a company. When I first joined, the work was somewhat interesting. We got to work on production systems and add new features that helped our enterprise customers. But then the generative AI wave kicked in, and then ensued the most short-sighted, irrational development strategy I have ever seen. For the last 8 months, we've been chasing this new market - forcing junior engineers to churn out finished products that they have no experience with at an insane rate. Management has no idea what it takes to build real cutting edge software systems, and their egos and stubbornness prevent them from actually hiring people who do know how. The tasks I received near the end of my time there were characterized by unrealistic deadlines, ill-defined goals, and incredible micromanaging by people who did not know at all what they were asking people to build. The engineering force is almost entirely composed of new grads and ~1 YoE, and management just can't fathom why we can't compete with OpenAI and Google and Amazon, and they take it out on us. It's just delusional. Management prides themselves on the fact that Hive has not had any layoffs despite the economic downturn. If you're interviewing currently, you've probably heard this and taken it as a sign of stability. What they didn't tell you is that the C-suite is always itching to fire someone. We lose people every week - they either burn out or get fired. New grad 2 weeks on the job? You can expect to be dumped on a high priority production project, and if you don't finish it, don't expect to last long here. They're always looking for any reason to get rid of engineers - and the worst part is, they offer no mentorship or support. "Senior" engineers (>1 year) are leaving by the dozen. Managers are ill-equipped to help their juniors, and there is absolutely no incentive at all to invest in any sort of long-term employee retention strategy. No code review, no formal documentation or onboarding, no decent third-party infrastructure (the company is cheap as hell and does not buy any solutions from other companies), and everything here is duct-taped together and one bad crash away from exploding. Don't get me wrong - you will learn a lot about the basics of how a production system works in your first month or so. After that, the burnout will start to settle in - the futility of your tasks, the emotional abuse and lack of respect from the higher-ups, and the complete disregard of boundaries in the name of insane timelines (don't be surprised if you get messaged at 9 PM asking something to be done "ASAP"). People are depressed, anxious, and stressed as hell when they get to their one year, and with the outlook of the business (trying desperately to raise Series E, terrible also-ran generative AI products, stagnating revenue), it doesn't look like the equity and options will be worth much anyways. Save yourself the trouble and find somewhere that won't chew you up and spit you out. If you have no other option - you need the visa sponsorship, or you just need some experience and money, just know what you're getting into. This ship is not going to last long unless there is some change - and they are not willing to change, even if it runs this company into the ground.

1.0
30 May 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

free soggy lunch and dinner.

Cons

My hope is that at least one person will read this and be second guess signing to this company. I don't believe any of the other positive reviews written here within the past year is from a person who is not currently in management. A lot of the positive reviews are from over a year ago and the company has changed a lot from then. This place is super stressful. Once I was here, I felt like I was navigating jungles of technical debt left behind by churned engineers. I realized quickly that there were barely any senior managers/engineers. This is not a good place if you are looking for serious mentorship. Many projects were doomed (as a result of mismanagement, bad project specs, not enough time/testing), and when they would fail, someone shortly thereafter gets blamed, yelled at, verbally abused on Slack, fired, or PIP'ed and left with lasting mental trauma. Engineers oftentimes were spontaneously moved to other projects and somehow managers couldn’t understand why a person might not be productive their first week on a different project. If I went one week without hearing someone getting scolded, yelled at, I considered that a lucky week. The atmosphere everyday in the office was palpable. I would get anxious on the commute to work or anytime I got a slack notification on my phone. Management seemed to portray themselves as flexible people. What "flexible" felt like was if management thinks something should be done the same day, in order to survive, you better stay in the office until it's done, even if you are asked right before you are leaving work. Flexible was just a euphemism for irregular hours. Anyone who wasn't with the program might receive profanity laden comments about them being replaceable or useless. Shortly before I left, there was an attitude of if you absent for your desk for more than 10 min, you were slacking and going to be on the shortlist for a PIP next review cycle. It wasn't unheard of for someone to be pushed out before their first performance review (every 6 months). It doesn't help that the management is composed of charlatans who portray themselves as if they were leading the next OpenAI. Technical decisions feel unilateral, taking in little consideration for engineering concerns/opinions. Dissent is met with skepticism and an attitude of "you're probably wrong, but go ahead and try. If it doesn't work, it's your employment on the line." You can tell how long someone has been at the company by how willing they were willing to voice a different opinion. Mileage varied, but eventually everyone breaks. Deadlines proposed by engineers invariably are met with questions about why the task proposed can’t be done in a fraction of the time estimated. Frankly, managers were unqualified and did not seem to understand the technicalities of what they wanted from engineers. Somehow managers would expect us to implement some highly technical design or research paper in a week, but if you ask them how they thought it worked, they would be clueless. Explaining time estimates felt like talking to a wall. If you are reading this, especially if you are on a visa or an international student, and you are considering working here, you should seriously reconsider accepting your offer. If I were to go back in time, I would’ve chosen being unemployed and taking a little more time to find employment elsewhere.

1.0
11 Dec 2023

Company run by man childs

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Edible free lunch and dinner. Lots of work if you want it.

Cons

All positive reviews here are fake. The company will never IPO, all the bragging about profitability, growth and this and that are lies. The company is essentially completely owned by the original co-founders who are now execs. They have no vision and are essentially all sociopathic. Lots of random firings and churning. Top dog gets mad? You are fired. Not your fault? Too bad, he wants to fire someone to calm his anger. The company is full of new grads but none of them actually want to be here. Any experienced engineers with any self respect will not take the BS from the execs. Execs micromanage to the bones. For non-entry level engineers and managers, you have zero autonomy. This Chief of tech guy will just come in, say no to your plans, sometimes even passively aggressive make some random comments that don't make sense. There is no trust. You basically become the speaker of the top dogs or else you are gone. Anyone who has stayed here for more than 2 years... probably have blended into the politics and kissed up to the top dogs to get power.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 153 Reviews

Glassdoor has 157 Hive (CA) reviews submitted anonymously by Hive (CA) employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hive (CA) is right for you.