JPA Health Reviews

2.8

44% would recommend to a friend

(64 total reviews)
avatar

Carrie Jones

47% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

JPA Health has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 64 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The JPA Health employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

64 reviews
4.0
26 May 2026

Good experience at JPA

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I enjoyed my time at JPA. The people are genuinely bright and collaborative, and there’s a strong culture of people wanting to do good work together. The agency also works with well known life sciences and pharma clients, so the work stays interesting and often feels meaningful. I especially appreciate JPAs openness to new ideas and investing in newer areas like AI and innovation instead of doing things the same old ways

Cons

Because JPA is growing and evolving, there can be some uncertainty at times around priorities and processes. Communication between teams can occasionally be inconsistent. That said, most people are willing to help and figure things out together

3.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting work with a varied client base

Cons

The CEO seems a little lost, lots of redundancies, change seems to be constant and not always for the good

1.0
22 Apr 2026

A Formerly Strong Agency That No Longer Recognizes Itself

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* After seeing a flurry of opportunities emerge at JPA Health, especially after numerous rounds of layoffs, I'm posting this to inform people of the truth about JPA Health and save them from a bad career decision. When I think of my time at JPA Health, not a lot of pros come to mind. If I had to nit-pick, the two things that stood out for me were some brilliant team members and impactful campaigns.

Cons

Too many to list but for the purpose of this post, I'll keep it short and sweet (not really, more raw and honest). • Horrible leadership: This started at the very top and it showed. A lack of empathy, trust, and basic respect was not occasional, it was the norm. The Founder and CEO routinely tore down people’s skills, minimized contributions, and inserted herself into everything without the context to do so effectively. There were no clear lanes, just constant second-guessing and undermining. And for an agency grounded in communication, they sure did not know how to communicate. Mixed messages, unclear direction, and constant ambiguity made it nearly impossible to operate with confidence. Boundaries did not exist. Work-life balance was something people tried to protect quietly, not something leadership respected. When it came down to it, fear tactics were used to pressure people into dropping personal commitments in service of the firm’s priorities. It was not urgency, it was control. • Piss-poor culture: This was a place where titles looked better than the experience behind them. Promotions were based on perception, not performance. People were elevated into leadership roles they were not ready for, managing teams they did not know how to support. Day to day, it felt less like a professional environment and more like a middle school lunchroom. People talked behind each other’s backs, defaulted to blame when things went wrong, and avoided accountability. There was little sense of shared ownership and even less of a true team mentality. Collaboration was something people said, not something they practiced. • Lack of professional development, onboarding and training: Onboarding to the agency and to individual client accounts was disorganized and, at times, nonexistent. You were expected to deliver immediately with little context, no clear process, and minimal guidance. There was no real operational backbone. No consistent ways of working, no structured training, no investment in helping people grow. The lack of process and organization caught up quickly. Internally, it created confusion and inefficiency. Externally, clients felt it. Frustration built, trust eroded, and eventually, business was lost. • Loss of identity: Finally, there is a clear identity issue. The agency has lost a strong sense of what it is and what it does best. In a shifting public health landscape, instead of sharpening its core expertise, it has tried to position itself as a broad, do-everything agency in line with larger industry players. This lack of focus has diluted its strengths and created ongoing confusion around its value and direction.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 64 Reviews

Glassdoor has 67 JPA Health reviews submitted anonymously by JPA Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if JPA Health is right for you.