Littler Mendelson Reviews

4.0

72% would recommend to a friend

(344 total reviews)

Tom Bender & Jeremy Roth

99% approve of CEO

96% positive business outlook

Littler Mendelson has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 344 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Littler Mendelson employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

344 reviews
2.0
9 Aug 2016

A Mess

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a management-side firm, Littler combats the cancer of faux victims, loathsome unions, and coin-chasing plaintiff's lawyers.

Cons

Unfortunately, Littler has serious problems. Like others, I became fed up with Littler's quality and decided to leave. The firm bangs the table telling everyone, repeatedly, it is the "largest" management-side labor and employment firm (certainly when you include non-traditional roles). It's sad how much the firm relies on this figure, as evidenced by management's cartoonish horror when Law360 noted Littler's slip in attorney headcount. What the firm doesn't promote is the lack of meaningful cohesion among offices and a corresponding lack of meaningful quality control among, and even within, those offices. The result is a loose collection of small firms, initially cobbled together from disparate practices, with inconsistent quality of work product and people. While there are some great offices and attorneys, there are also terrible offices and attorneys, and the latter cast quite a shadow. Over the years, I had the misfortune of working with some incredibly incompetent shareholders and woefully unqualified associates. On one hand, you have shareholders who bill significant time to the file yet don't know what's happening on the case. Watch the chaos unfold when the court denies summary judgment and sets trial, and these types scramble to catch up on years of litigation in six weeks. On the other hand, you have shareholders who shouldn't be let out of the house: confusing clients and cases, forgetting facts, not remembering strategy, etc. Court appearances with them are a mess even when you feed them a script (which you must). Then you have shareholders who run this scheme of demanding that junior shareholders manage their cases, but refusing to split credit under the pretext they're still managing the matters, when they're not. (Practice tip: Tell them to find someone else. They'll either slither away or cave. If you're competent and/or have some of your own business you won't need them to crush your GEC.) Associate quality is all over the map and it takes forever for the firm to manage out poor performers, if it addresses them at all. Candid reviews and ratings are frowned upon by at least one office. I understand the appeal of treating future in house counsel kindly but this tack only hurts the firm's representation of current clients. The firm's efforts at innovation seem geared more toward being the first than being the best. CaseSmart is a disappointment. The internal backlash against it is very real, and who could blame the opposition? Just ask the shareholders "supervising" CaseSmart matters, assuming they haven't quit for a competitor. The firm's diversity groups, while ostensibly well-intentioned on paper, are, at least for one particular group, roving bands of past-their-prime malcontents and an embarrassment and disservice to the minority groups they purport to represent. The childish conduct and disrespect toward others are foul. The turnover at the firm, and at some especially unsavory offices, is notable, but hardly surprising given the terrible morale, hostile management, lack of leadership, and poor pay relative to hours. Of course, the driftwood remains - they have nowhere else to go - and the clients continue to suffer. The problems seemed to have worsened considerably under the current executive management. The recent transition to Kansas City was awkward and some attorneys were quick to blame problems on the new team rather than management where it belongs. The mask comes off when attorneys leave. Rather than try to understand why, or avoid burning bridges, elements in the firm, including certain office managing shareholders, members of the board and/or management committee members, and the firm's in house counsel, behave terribly. The insecurity is stunning. These people either don't realize or don't care that this behavior gets backs to the attorney in question and, more importantly, passed along to people inside and outside the firm. I ultimately left Littler because I grew tired of the incompetence and atrocious environment. Life and career are too short to spend much of either at Littler.

1.0
23 Nov 2017

Expressway to Hell

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hydraulic desks, flossers in the bathroom and mouthwash so after you are done kissing booty to try to save your job, you can still have fresh breath.

Cons

You’ll never get the right price for selling your soul. Finance (billing & collections) has become the vortex of darkness and despair with its own dark queen and a few minions. While she sometimes tries to use passive aggressive techniques, all who work with her know she is trying to break you down mentally and emotionally. While I say this somewhat in jest I still encourage you to consider the expense to your mental welfare as well as your sense of basic decency, both will go down the drain. Those who sit in the ivory tower are so oblivious to the destruction being created right under foot by the C-level OO , the co-managers, Directors of hr, it and casemart that they should be ashamed. This firm has earned itself such a bad reputation especially in the Kansas City area that soon they will have difficulty finding anyone let alone qualified candidates. Another con is the fact I can’t list these peoples names because it is against the policy for this site. If you are there you know who they are.

2.0
5 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the best people I have ever worked with: passionate, knowledgeable IT professionals (especially the IT Operations team.

Cons

Firm management (specifically the Managing Shareholder and CFO) are political, petty, short-sighted and do not truly care about employees. Through poor management decisions they caused the IT Department to implode. It started with outsourcing the Help Desk. Then they fired Michael Williams, the long-standing Chief Technology Officer, and replaced him with a series of highly paid hacks whose job it was to dismantle the IT team. Some really good, loyal staff and managers were fired or quit. I quit after 9 years at the firm, having watched the IT Department turn into a quivering mess of backstabbing, in-fighting and floundering. Don't waste your time here.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 344 Reviews

Glassdoor has 366 Littler Mendelson reviews submitted anonymously by Littler Mendelson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Littler Mendelson is right for you.