Mastronardi Produce Reviews

2.9

44% would recommend to a friend

(287 total reviews)

Paul Mastronardi

61% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Mastronardi Produce has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 287 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Mastronardi Produce employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Agriculture industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

287 reviews
1.0
25 Nov 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A completely unethical company that fires and releases people for no reason at all. The owners of the company required that one of their families have all their managers there on a Saturday for a meeting with the family.....and guess what? They never showed. Seriously?? Their current Senior Vice President is a complete gas lighter who temporarily builds people up only to tear them down the very next minute. I witnessed this daily in meetings. They hired a corporate employee and this employee had to relocate themselves on their own dime, and they fired that employee a couple of weeks later for no cause. They tend to separate folks that are older and more experienced because the current SVP thinks that will save the company the most money. The company lacks direction and does not invest for the future whatsoever. They literally have lost their entire technical team and the exodus will continue until they get rid of the executive leadership team. I have my own documented support for this and so many other issues that the company suffers from. They treat the hourly staff terribly. The hours are bad, the conditions are bad. Their Livonia facility is absolutely the filthiest facility I have ever seen.

Cons

The morale across each site is terrible. The turnover must be over 70% annually. Any questions about the validity of this review then just interview an ample sample size of the employee population and the story will tell itself. Any effective leaders have long vacated their positions with this company. Do yourself a favor and please steer clear of this organization. They only want to line their pockets with money on the backs of very good people and their hard labor.

1.0
2 June 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Highly proficient at marketing. (See all of the positive reviews and read between the lines)

Cons

This will be 2 parts: my personal experience (subjective) and data (objective). Objective Data: 1. For an organization of this size and requirements the IT department is between 400 - 500% under-budgeted with about 1/5th of the staff it needs. 2. Work week is between 55 and 70 hours to include nights and weekends. My average was 62.5. 3. There were 109 projects in my department when I left, all priority 1. 4. Average employment length is 7 months. 5. At will is used. 6. The entire Finance department was let go. (Before my time) 7. Half of the HR department walked out with little to no notice. Seasoned professionals. 8. Half of the help desk walked out (this was heard secondhand). 9. SEVEN security professionals cycled in and out in less than a year. (CISO, CISSPs, Engineer, and 2 analysts) 10. Contracted for 15-20% bonus. Received 3%. 11. Salary is increased by 1% annually. With inflation that is a 7% pay cut on average. 12. Contracted for remote work. This was taken away temporarily after my remote team was put on a hybrid pilot program. The CEO did a roll call and revoked it for most. Personal Experience: I had a few over-the-top experiences that overstepped some hard boundaries for me that I will summarize. 1. My toddler had to go to the ER so he stayed home for a day. In a 1:1 I was told, "Anything you need we are here to fully support you." My toddler then jumped on my lap and within the same breath, I was told "Are we going to have a problem here? Do we need to discuss your work-from-home arrangement?" 2. I was singled out on numerous occasions. CEO is used as a boogieman and "company policies" are loosely applied at random to push individual preferences. 3. I was not listened to and then held accountable for other people's inaction. Ex: I researched, purchased, installed, and maintained multiple solutions. When I asked IT to come to the meetings to research they didn't show up. When I asked for help solutioning they said just pick something and we'll figure it out. When it came time to install, I asked for help completing the IT requirements documents and received no response on about a dozen emails and chats. Then I setup meetings and they didn't show. Then I escalated to my boss. Then when it came time to install they acted surprised when the vendors asked them to be prepared and the solution wouldn't work. This happened at least 5 times, not only was it embarrassing but I was then told that "I didn't plan this well enough". Less hard boundaries but unprofessional experiences: 1. Security was used as a rubber stamp/scapegoat. If I informed IT that the risk was not acceptable because no due diligence was applied I was argued with for weeks about how there is no risk. When that was proven false, non-relevant data was used to try and just win arguments. 2. We fixed not configured or improperly configured tools, implemented new solutions, hired and trained new staff, maintained operations, provided metrics and executive reports and presentations, stopped numerous attacks, and audited most of the environment. If even a single spam email got through: "why didn't you" or "why can't you just" 3. I was encouraged to reduce security because my team didn't release an email within 7 minutes of notification after hours. The phone call was returned within 5 minutes. 4. IT did not show up to ~80% of security-related meetings. 5. Security is cut off at the knees with their arms tied behind their backs and told "we take security seriously" and "you are highly supported" a. IT Tier 1/2/3 was empowered to gate-keep all security decisions but security was held responsible for those decisions. b. IT given decisioning authority on potential major security incidents but security is held responsible for the outcomes. Security is not informed of security events. c. Security tools and permissions revoked or uninstalled with no notification. d. Denied access for 10+ months to security tools and then held responsible for security events involving those tools…. You know… that we didn't have access to… e. Had to work with vendors outside of the company just to get access to tools to protect the company. f. Engineer told he was "wasting his time" recommending minimal configs for his specialty tool. g. All of IT EXCLUDING security received security alerts. Security requested this be changed and was denied. 6. One of the hardest working employees was recommended to be fired THREE times in a meeting simply because management didn't like their slightly different working schedule. TL;DR - Complete disregard for employee welfare, zero flexibility, and willful negligence with a severe lack of ethics

1.0
19 Oct 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is competitive, industry is interesting, stops right about there.

Cons

Upper management and department management are really really toxic. There are some good people but this is my 6th company in my career and this one by far takes the cake for being the worst. A lot of nepotism (family owned) and gang mentality (you have to be there for a long time to earn their respect). They treat people very poorly and a lot of turnover on both sides (fired and leaving). There is virtually no culture, HR seems ill-equipped to do much. Management just does not know how to treat people nor manage people in general, lots of micro management. No work for home policy available after covid restrictions released, they clawed everyone back ASAP with no hybrid model. A lot of people have left and are leaving because of this. What does that tell you, lack of trust. Things are very disorganized and you do not have access to resources like you would at a larger company, people just end up doing a mediocre job.. The organization is also missing quite a few key positions of people who used to exist but left and they never replaced them. The systems for accounting and finance are really antiquated, lots and lots of manual labor with data (think $14/hr data entry type work) being done by people with 5+ years of experience.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 287 Reviews

Glassdoor has 309 Mastronardi Produce reviews submitted anonymously by Mastronardi Produce employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mastronardi Produce is right for you.