Medterra Reviews

2.3

21% would recommend to a friend

(60 total reviews)

Gregory Reeder

13% approve of CEO

17% positive business outlook

Medterra has an employee rating of 2.3 out of 5 stars, based on 60 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Medterra employee rating is 35% below average for employers within the Retail and wholesale industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

60 reviews
1.0
1 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Remote work flexibility - Strong, supportive colleagues across teams

Cons

- Leadership, particularly HR, lacked professionalism and empathy - Limited focus on employee wellbeing - Lack of transparency in decision-making - Inconsistent and reactive decision-making

1.0
17 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great discounts, remote work is a plus

Cons

Toxic leadership, inept HR, favoritism in hiring. Certain people are moved around the company, given endless second chances as heads of new product launch or head of sales despite zero experience and failing to deliver any meaningful results. HR enables toxic culture that the CEO implements, refusing raises to people based on their subjective (disassociated and unrelated) opinion about your performance, ignoring manager input. CEO has no concept of what the business is about, constantly trying to launch products that inevitably fail, and when they do his solution is to fire people to try and recoup some money, company would be much better off without him.

2.0
2 Mar 2026

Advancement driven by politics, favoritism, and inconsistent leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, employee discount, handful of people

Cons

The culture is political and rooted in favoritism. Advancement and opportunity are not consistently tied to measurable performance or business outcomes. Proximity to select individuals carries more weight than results. High performers are often overextended while others are insulated. Behavioral standards are applied inconsistently. Male leaders were permitted to speak aggressively, raise their voices, and reprimand employees publicly without consequence. These incidents were visible and known. HR did not meaningfully intervene. When concerns were raised, employees were often told to resolve issues themselves rather than seeing patterns of unprofessional conduct addressed structurally. This reinforced a culture where accountability depended on who you were, not what occurred. HR exerts disproportionate influence over structural and career-impacting decisions without clear operational or financial grounding. Decisions around leveling, compensation, and reporting lines often lack transparency and measurable criteria. This reinforces internal politics and compounds inequities. Leadership lacks cohesion and long-term clarity. Organizational changes are frequent and poorly executed. Priorities shift without discipline, creating unnecessary rework and normalized burnout. Compensation does not reliably reflect scope. Responsibility expands faster than pay, recognition, or structural support. If you are comfortable navigating politics and aligning yourself strategically, you may advance. If you expect merit-based growth, disciplined operations, and consistent professional standards, this will be frustrating.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 60 Reviews

Glassdoor has 62 Medterra reviews submitted anonymously by Medterra employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Medterra is right for you.