Murgitroyd Reviews

2.5

29% would recommend to a friend

(35 total reviews)

Gordon Stark

22% approve of CEO

25% positive business outlook

Murgitroyd has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 35 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Murgitroyd employee rating is 33% below average for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

35 reviews
1.0
16 Mar 2026

A Terminal Decline

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very flexible working arrangements. Most staff are good to work with.

Cons

Things have been going downhill at Murgitroyd for a while, but the pace of decline seems to be getting ever quicker and now seems to be terminal. Demands on staff are ever increasing - forced to record time to account for every second of your day, forced to put company expenses on your own account to be paid later, told to meet a continually changing suite of KPIs, told to deal with agents who haven’t been paid by Murgitroyd in months while simultaneously requesting funds on account for any work we are doing. The demands are ever changing, ever more desperate and produce no results beyond demoralising staff and annoying clients. Change is expected, and needs to happen in any business. However, changes at Murgitroyd are never part of a plan, just a reaction to the latest poor financial performance. There is no long term strategy evident, nor has there been for several years. Maybe that is to be expected when the management team seems to be a revolving door as people arrive and then leave in short order. All of this is now coming to a head, and several long term employees in senior positions are leaving. These are good people who have been the core of Murgitroyd for a decade or more in many cases, and they have had enough. When these kind of people leave, the decline is usually terminal.

1.0
27 Feb 2026

Toxic culture and leadership issues

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great colleagues even though morale is low The ability to work from home

Cons

This company has become an increasingly difficult place to work and sadly I can only see it becoming more toxic. As others have said, some of the leadership team don’t seem to know what they’re doing. That’s reflected in how defensive certain individuals can be if you question decisions or raise concerns. Salaries were low to begin with and have been stagnant for the last couple of years, which has only made things worse. There's a lot of negativity and many staff particularly at non director level feel undervalued. There's never money available when it comes to pay or properly resourcing teams, yet there’s no issue funding international travel for senior leadership. That’s frustrating, especially when most businesses cut those costs first in tougher times. There have already been redundancies and no doubt there will be more, which inevitably increases the pressure on those who remain. Several long serving employees have started to leave and morale has suffered further as a result. Attorneys previously only had billable time targets but are now expected to record all time to account for their full working day. This also applies to paralegals and patent and trademark support. This shift has nothing to do with productivity and only adds to the constant pressure attorneys are under. It also adds to the feeling that staff are not fully trusted to do their jobs. A few years ago there was a strong focus on wellbeing and mental health but that now feels like nothing more than lip service. The attitude towards those experiencing work related stress in particular has at times been dismissive and unsupportive. My advice to anyone considering joining would be to seriously consider all other options first. Personally I wouldn’t work for another private equity owned company again.

1.0
5 June 2026

Toxic from the top down

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None, only thing that comes to mind is that they have offices. Some flexible working.

Cons

The biggest issue with this firm is a lack of transparency and the toxicity. Important decisions are made behind closed doors and information is drip-fed when management has no choice but to share it. You spend a lot of time trying to work out what’s actually happening and often have to rely on rumours. It’s absolutely disgraceful how people are treated when they decide to leave. The moment you hand in your notice or even if it becomes known that you’re exploring other opportunities then their behaviour changes dramatically. People who have been valued members of the team from day one they become an enemy. They’re excluded from discussions treated different, made to feel like outsiders. it’s such a hostile environment and not something you would expect from a company that talks so much about cultures and values and being one big family There’s also a tendency to introduce policies without any warning or consultation. There’s no reason given for anything. It’s often some random stupid excuse like growth. Management simply expect everyone to accept whatever is decided. As soon as you speak up you’re no longer “valued” member of the team but a “problem” that has to be managed. I’ve genuinely never worked anywhere else where people were discarded so quickly almost to the point that they are dehumanised. You’ll hear endless conversations about chargeable hours and financial performance. Every meeting somehow comes back to billing. But if you step back and look objectively, all the actual work is carried by attorneys and support staff. Some senior people are excellent, but there are plenty who are barely scraping by. Your experience can vary massively depending on which team you’re placed in and who happens to like you. Some people seem protected regardless of performance as they are “favourites” while others have to fight for every opportunity and every bit of recognition. Recognition is another issue. The firm talks constantly about awards and celebrating success, but it often feels like the same people receive recognition over and over again. When good work is done, it’s very common for senior people to take all the credit and as soon as there is a mistake it comes down to the individual again. They pick and choose when to be a “team”. You’re told budgets are tight. You’re told sacrifices have to be made. You’re told there isn’t money for certain things. Then you’ll see money spent on expensive trips particularly by the MDs, events, consultants, new leadership positions or management initiatives that don’t appear to generate any meaningful value. It seems like a revolving door of senior hires. New directors, chiefs, heads of this and that arrive with great fanfare. Nobody really understands what they’re there to do. Then some disappear a few months later and nobody says a word. All this while the people doing the actual client work are expected to keep carrying more and more responsibility with “peanuts” of a salary that they label as “competitive”. You’d expect people in senior positions to act professional, but some of them actually talk trash about their own teams and discriminate openly. It’s disappointing and honestly, it’s embarrassing. They think they’re untouchable, but everyone sees right through it. The so-called “chiefs” and MDs are probably the biggest problem. HR just waves their hands, saying they can’t do anything. HR stands for Human Resources but here they forget what being “human” even means. The only way to save this “months away” from drowning business is to replace the entire senior leadership team and rebuild from scratch. They talk about change so much but the only change this business needs is at the top.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 35 Reviews

Glassdoor has 38 Murgitroyd reviews submitted anonymously by Murgitroyd employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Murgitroyd is right for you.