OrangeOnions Reviews

3.3

59% would recommend to a friend

(38 total reviews)
avatar

Dovi Kutoff

60% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

OrangeOnions has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 38 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The OrangeOnions employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Retail and wholesale industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

38 reviews
5.0
30 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’ve worked here for several years now and the company has grown exponentially over the last few years. I wish disgruntled former employees would put this more into consideration and do not expect a perfectly well oiled machine of a workplace. We are constantly growing and learning. What you do get is the ability to easily communicate your concerns and needs to upper management. With this you’re able to really shape your experience here into what you want it to be, with some understandable restrictions. I am overall satisfied with my job here because I actively voiced my concerns any time I had any, and had them addressed appropriately. Just be kind, do what is asked of you, respect your colleagues and you should be fine here.

Cons

No remote work or hybrid opportunities. If you are expecting everything to be perfect, look elsewhere because this is an ever-growing, rapidly changing company and you have to be able to adapt. You have to be up for the challenge.

1.0
27 May 2025

Does not recommend!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was a tough call, but I'm going to say "NONE."

Cons

Terrible Work-Life Balance & Unequal Treatment: The company enforces a strict in-office policy for nearly all employees, yet HR personnel are allowed to work 100% remotely. This creates significant resentment and a strong sense of unfairness among the rest of the staff, severely impacting morale and work-life balance. Expectations for in-office presence do not align with the flexibility offered to a select few. Excessive Micromanagement: Micromanagement is rampant and stifling. There are constant, unnecessary check-ins, and leadership frequently dictates how to perform tasks, even when employees possess extensive experience (e.g., 20 years with specific software). Every decision is questioned, leading to a lack of trust and autonomy. Time tracking is excessive, further undermining professional independence and creating a highly pressurized environment. Incompetent Marketing Leadership: The so-called VP of Sales and Marketing lacks fundamental knowledge of modern marketing strategies. Their inability to understand target audiences, lead a marketing department effectively, or adapt to current market trends is glaring. This leadership relies heavily on outdated methods and, shockingly, frequently consults AI for basic answers instead of leveraging internal expertise. This has resulted in a series of failed campaigns and an inability to promote products effectively. Marketing Department Misdirection: A profound disconnect exists within the marketing team, as they refer to it. There is no direct marketing leader to drive the team and manage it effectively. Individuals with legitimate marketing degrees and practical experience are consistently ignored in favor of those who appear to rely on generic AI outputs and YouTube tutorials for their strategic direction. This leads to poor quality, generic campaigns that fail to resonate with real-world situations, wasting resources, and hindering the company's growth potential. The sales department seems to dictate marketing strategy, which is a fundamental misstep.

avatar
OrangeOnions Response
1y
We always take feedback seriously, even when it's deeply misaligned with the truth. It's important to us—and to our team—that we clarify a few key facts about this situation while also acknowledging broader points raised. On the Individual's Experience and Conduct We gave this individual not just an opportunity, but multiple chances to succeed. Despite misrepresenting their skill set during the hiring process, we made good faith efforts to support their growth and help them deliver results. Unfortunately, those results never materialized. Instead, we witnessed consistent misuse of company time, including work on personal ventures during hours paid by OrangeOnions. This is not conjecture—it was documented and corroborated. Further, the individual Jason Wise - omitted the fact that they have a criminal history that was not disclosed during hiring. We believe in second chances and treated them with fairness despite that—but we expected professionalism, honesty, and focus in return, which we did not receive. We understand the sting of being held accountable, but misleading public reviews that omit such core facts cross a line. We owe it to our team—especially those who work hard and uphold our values—to set the record straight. On Remote Work and Fairness We acknowledge the concerns raised about work-from-home policies. While certain roles—such as those in HR—require different access, confidentiality constraints, or scheduling needs that may justify remote arrangements, we understand how this can be perceived as inconsistent. We’re actively reviewing these policies to ensure greater clarity and fairness for all departments. On Leadership and Management Feedback about micromanagement and marketing leadership has also been noted. We agree that autonomy and respect for expertise are critical. We’re making targeted improvements in how we structure our check-ins and delegate ownership. That said, our expectations for accountability—especially after multiple failed deliverables—should not be mistaken for micromanagement. As for our marketing strategy: Yes, we use AI as a tool. So do top-tier companies across every industry. But we combine this with human expertise, industry research, and team collaboration. The assertion that our strategies are “based on YouTube tutorials” is simply not accurate and unfairly discredits the work of our dedicated team. Moving Forward Constructive criticism makes us better. Inflammatory, misleading reviews only harm those who are genuinely trying to improve our shared environment. We wish the reviewer growth and clarity as they pursue future roles—and we remain committed to building a workplace that rewards honesty, effort, and collaboration. — OrangeOnions Leadership Team
1.0
12 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cool concepts and designs / licences

Cons

Want immediate returns while not completely understanding sales process

Viewing 1 - 3 of 38 Reviews

Glassdoor has 38 OrangeOnions reviews submitted anonymously by OrangeOnions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if OrangeOnions is right for you.