Is this your company?
3.5
60% would recommend to a friend
67% positive business outlook
Pros
- Product does positively impact people's lives - Lots of smart, highly capable and friendly people
Cons
- Such a shame for a start up to be such a political environment to work in. - Whilst constant change is expected in a start up, the underlying strategy to achieve the business vision is lacking. - The founders both struggle to listen to others (apart from a select few). They also both have very particular ways of doing things. - Bit of a fear / blame culture where you are judged daily without constructive feedback. They struggle to 'assume good intent' of people. - Deadly silent office as that is the founders preferred way of working - again, not what you expect from a start up. - The founders take everything quite personally, so they sometimes react with emotion without thinking rationally.
Pros
NOTE: I left in summer 2018. This information may be out of date at the time of reading. - Ending type 2 diabetes is worthwhile - Product is good - Free healthy snacks - Many friendly coworkers with various hobbies and interests - Good gender balance - Opportunities for high impact as team is small - Informal vibe and dress code - Flexibility re routine working hours and arrangements for some employees - Physical-health-focused culture (diet and exercise) rubs off on you - Free gym membership - Stock options - Near Westfield - Surprisingly good approach to keeping user data private - Free stash (gym shirts, water bottles etc.) - Monthly socials - Ambitious founders - Peer bonus system - Life is good while you're in management's "good books"
Cons
Typical startup - Micromanagement - Reporting directly to founders stressful - No autonomy - you can get something done very quickly if green-lit by management, but those things are few and far between + management flip-flops - Startup salary (underpaid) - Work can be unnecessarily stressful because of poor communication - Deadlines can be unnecessarily tight because of poor planning - Hours can get much longer depending on workload. EDIT: Presenteeism. I was told that it was about "getting stuff done", but when I could get stuff done before 6:30 - or before 6 - and want to go home, that was not acceptable - I was told to stay later (and did so). Fair enough - the hours in the contract were 9:30 - 6:30, lunch break = 1 hour - Cliques and favouritism - Unprofessional use of Slack to relay sensitive information which should be delivered face-to-face in a proper meeting room - Few meeting rooms - On average, employees are young and inexperienced - rewarded for not asking too many questions when it comes to management - Office noise level high - Women’s opinions shot down and then "hepeated" by men to great success - Very bad commute unless you live in West London - Career development depends on whether management think you're "smart" - Professional discussions can turn personal very quickly - Attempt to conform to 'happy-clappy' startup culture versus high-stress environment is awkward - Management follow contracts to the letter on their side but are upset if you do the same e.g. notice period - Lack of boundaries between professional and friendly behaviour - Split in culture between founders and everyone else - The mission fades into the background - seems like it's more about the business opportunity than helping people - and the day-to-day is too hectic to remember what the point of it all is - Some poor product decisions made in the past haunt the current product - Decisions are "data-driven" except when management want to do something else - Management overrule domain experts in specialised fields e.g. dietetics, UI design, software engineering for no clear business reason - Corporate KPI-type systems from big tech companies half-heartedly implemented with no follow-through - Several long, unproductive all-hands meetings which seem more to give an impression of a "startup" culture than to actually produce deliverables or foster collaboration or just plain old communication - Frequent (monthly) socials awkward if there are professional issues - I personally found it awkward to say no to a monthly social - Sometimes can feel like management are making it up as they go along - Somewhat intellectually elitist vibe and somewhat unpredictable emotional responses from management makes every little mistake or miscommunication - or even perfectly reasonable request for help or information - into emotional rollercoasters - A few strange incidents like a mug being put in a toilet, and instances of poor hygiene (urine on floor?) in bathroom, which shouldn't be the case for any office, let alone a health-tech company - Employees too young/inexperienced to know when they're experiencing low-level workplace bullying or being "managed out" - Too much emphasis on branding and stash, not enough on fundamentals of workplace culture - A lot of effort expended by management on never EXPLICITLY being judgmental/unprofessional which makes it harder to call out - Part-time employees pressured to go full-time, stopping short of explicit ultimatums - Stressful not knowing what management's true values are - lots of disingenuous "friendly" behaviour - a cutthroat culture is made better if one is just honest so people know what they're getting into - A lot of hoopla around getting honest/anonymous feedback from employees/ one-on-ones, which is impossible in such a small company - All of the above waste everyone's time and energy which is a shame as there are many talented employees
Pros
- "Flexible" working options - Free fruit/chocolate
Cons
- Extremely bureaucratic environment for such an early stage start up - Favouritism - Founders lack direction and vision for the company - Judgemental environment - Beware of making mistakes / asking for help - Little opportunity for personal growth / development - Not somewhere to work long-term
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.