Does Research to Practice pay their employees well?

According to anonymously submitted Glassdoor reviews, Research to Practice employees rate their compensation and benefits as 2.8 out of 5. Find out more about salaries and benefits at Research to Practice. This rating has been stable over the past 12 months.

How satisfied are employees working at Research to Practice?

32% of Research to Practice employees would recommend working there to a friend based on Glassdoor reviews . Employees also rated Research to Practice 1.8 out of 5 for work life balance, 2.0 for culture and values and 1.9 for career opportunities.

What are the pros of working at Research to Practice according to real employee reviews?

"Company has ok benefits, and great coworkers." ((in 4 reviews))

What are the cons of working at Research to Practice according to real employee reviews?

"3. Upper level management is given sole access to the CEO (who makes all decisions) and management does not represent their employees well" ((in 4 reviews)); "Managers barely show up to work." ((in 3 reviews))

Research to Practice Reviews

2.2

32% would recommend to a friend

(20 total reviews)

Neil Love

29% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Company ratings over time

Ratings trend for the last 6 months (20 reviews)

Research to Practice has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 20 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Research to Practice employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

20 reviews

1.0

15 Mar 2024

Toxic, Rude

Anonymous employee

Recommend

CEO approval

Business outlook

Pros

Decent pay and ok benefits.

Cons

Rude, verbally abusive coworkers. Never in my entire professional career have I been spoken to the way I was spoken to in this company. Hostile work environment with a mix of temperamental/verbally abusive supervisors and other supervisors that turn a blind eye/let them get away with it. Shaky, inconsistent onboarding process. Conflicting information from different supervisors and a culture of blame towards employees instead of being accountable for poor leadership. RUN, don't walk, RUN away from this company. I didn't believe the bad reviews I read here, took a chance on this company, and regretted it. Save yourself the wasted time and stress.

2.0

6 Mar 2024

General Review

Associate

Recommend

CEO approval

Business outlook

Pros

Completely remote, no micromanagement, and ability to travel

Cons

Poor communication, no diversity, performing multiple jobs at once

1.0

1 Oct 2023

No Transparency and Poor Leadership

Grant manager

Recommend

CEO approval

Business outlook

Pros

The entire company is remote, so you can work from home

Cons

-No transparency on the inner workings of the company, particularly financial. -Contracts say there is no pharmaceutical marketing, but they prioritize showcasing the drugs of companies who have funded programs. -When someone leaves the company, they don't hire they just pile more work on current employees with no pay increase. -There is pressure to be on call 24/7 and drop everything if the CEO needs something. -There is minimal upward mobility and little room for change or sharing constructive feedback. -Their operations systems are quite poor - no database, just lots of repetitive spreadsheets. -Leadership is very passive aggressive, with no clear communication on agendas/action items/directives for meetings. -The company is run by people who've been in leadership for decades or are part of the founder's family. These individuals get priority in decision making, but do not have the professional development growth trajectory to back it up. -Also the one HR professional also manages the founder's personal properties. Felt like a conflict of interest.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 20 Reviews