SR2 Reviews

4.4

85% would recommend to a friend

(33 total reviews)

Chris Sheard

85% approve of CEO

86% positive business outlook

SR2 has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 33 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The SR2 employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Human resources and staffing industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

33 reviews
2.0
19 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I wanted to share a review as I have seen a couple of review lately which don't really tell a full story as to why they are rated so low. I also wanted to post one real review from a long time employee and not just 5 star reviews employees are asked to do during tenure. I don't want this review to just be negative as that isn't fair and it takes away from some of the truly amazing people in this company and some of the genuine pros of SR2 when compared with other agencies in Bristol. Some genuinely great people work at this agency and I will still recommend individual consultants to people in the market looking for work in the tech space. Some real market experts. Culturally, the business has had its highs and its lows as any business does with growth but the culture was always good across the board. Lots of people I would happily see and spend time with out of work and I do regularly miss the culture and the people I worked with. When we were doing the charity and volunteering work it was very fulfilling. 99% of the people working at SR2 are highly emotionally intelligent / genuinely good people. Good work events and socials. Dogs allowed in the office. Dress down policy. Nice office space, well lit, plants and greenery inside. Team managers and billing managers are great and do the best that they can do between the rock and hard place that is protecting their team and dealing with the CEO.

Cons

In truth, the business is let down by 2 of the 3 founders. I'm not naming names but people who have worked there will know which 2 and I feel like they will know themselves which says a lot. If the shoe fits right? There have been times where it's felt like virtue signal recruitment would be a better name and I have quickly seen the company come back on its own tagline of 'People over Profit' when the profits were dipping. The core values of the business are 'Be a good human, be accountable, don't be a d**head'. They are written on the wall of the office in bold letters but the CEO either didn't read them or doesn't care to uphold himself to the same values expected of his employees. In my time with SR2 I have seen: - People bullied out of the business, including female employees bullied out the business by a fellow female (and Founder) that claim's they want to uplift women in Tech and Recruitment. - One of the founders saying how tough things are financially one day (in front of people making CONSIDERABLY less and maybe genuinely struggling at times) but bragging about how much money they made in one year another day. This was then followed by her being visibly annoyed when one of the best performing consultants (someone who was treated terribly by the CEO because he didn't like him despite the money he made for the business) showed her he had earned more that year. - People belittled, embarrassed, shamed and talked down on by the CEO when they've left and much, much worse. We all remember what he put in that sales meeting! Probably one of the most horrific moments I have witnessed within a professional environment. - One rule for the CEO's favourites and another rule for the rest. Principal consultants blanking for months on end with no action taken but less senior/less favoured employees being put on PIPs in a heartbeat as well as top performers being left out and overlooked purely purely because he didn't like them. - Different rules for founders and employees. For example, there used to be no splits on fees for bringing on clients and no working outside of your vertical UNTIL you're a founder that brings on an account you want all to yourself. The sad thing is there is a lot more I could mention that really isn't aligned with the social responsibility the company preaches. It's a shame because the cons really are driven by 2 of the 3 figureheads of the business whilst the other 99% of the employees and the Third Founder really do care and are genuinely good people who like to help and give back. I can honestly say that some of the best people I have worked with in my life have been at SR2 but also two of the worst, cleverly masquerading as people full of kindness when really they'd throw anyone under the bus if it meant they got a leg up in life. The sad truth is for those 2 founders, the 'social responsibility' has always been an intelligent way to market the business and line their pockets and more people can see that now than they realise.

avatar
SR2 Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed feedback. It’s evident that you’ve reflected deeply on your experience, and I appreciate the opportunity to engage with your perspective. Feedback like yours is invaluable as it allows us to critically assess our strengths and areas for improvement. First, it’s reassuring to hear that certain aspects of SR2’s culture—such as the camaraderie within the team, the quality of our people and our commitment to charity and volunteering—had a positive impact on your experience. These are foundational to who we are, and we’re glad they resonated with you. However, I want to address some of the concerns you’ve raised, particularly around leadership, the notion of "virtue signalling," and the balance between maintaining a high-performance culture and our "people over profit" ethos. You mentioned that our focus on social responsibility and diversity could be perceived as more about marketing than genuine intent. It’s crucial for me to clarify that our commitment to these areas is far from superficial. Virtue signalling implies empty gestures made for public approval with no action, but our track record tells a different story. SR2 has donated over £250,000 to various charities, a tangible reflection of our dedication to making a real difference. If this was a mere marketing ploy as you suggest, it’s quite an expensive one. Technology Volunteers is entirely pro-bono and has taken hours upon hours of hard work to get it where it is today. That’s taking action and making an impact. This isn’t just about enhancing our brand; it’s about living our values and making a positive impact on the communities we serve. I am sure Young Bristol and Gypanzees with whom you volunteered for whilst at SR2 would agree to name just a few charities we have partnered with and impacted positively in the community. This is central to our identity as a B-Corp-certified company, a certification that demands accountability, transparency, and a true commitment to balancing purpose and profit. Regarding the personal attacks you make on our female founder, I feel it’s important to challenge this criticism head-on. Our founder has played a pivotal role in shaping SR2’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and social responsibility. While no person or leader is perfect, the characterisation of her efforts as anything less than sincere undermines the significant contributions she has made in fostering a supportive, equitable and high-performance workplace. It’s vital to remember that leadership involves difficult decisions, and personal attacks—especially those that may be rooted in gender bias—do not contribute to a constructive dialogue. I also want to address the balance between maintaining a high-performance culture and our "people over profit" philosophy. We firmly believe in supporting our employees and prioritising their well-being, but we also recognise the importance of performance in sustaining the business. It’s a delicate balancing act—one that requires careful consideration. Performance management, including the implementation of performance improvement plans, is sometimes necessary to address consistent underperformance. This is not about undermining our commitment to people; rather, it’s about ensuring that the business remains viable so that we can continue to support everyone involved. Allowing consistent underperformance to persist unchecked would be negligent, as it could jeopardise the sustainability of the company and, by extension, the jobs of all our employees. The reality is that without profitability, we wouldn’t be able to continue providing the support and opportunities that are central to our mission. It’s not a matter of choosing profit over people; it’s about recognising that the two are interconnected and proving they can go hand in hand. To truly prioritise our people, we must ensure the company remains strong and capable of fulfilling its commitments, both to our employees and to the broader community. If the company made no profit, we would make zero donations to charity for example and, ironically, your mention of virtue-signalling might actually stand up then. In conclusion, I want to thank you again for your feedback. It’s through discussions like these that we can learn, grow, and refine our approach. I wish you all the best in your future endeavours and hope that you find a workplace that aligns perfectly with your goals and values.
1.0
12 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dogs allowed in office is about the only pro during my tenure at SR2.

Cons

CEO is not a nice person to work for. He’s great when you’re making him a tonne of money, but god forbid you have anything going on at home that means you need time off, or you get an unlucky month. It wasn’t unusual to have to stand up in front of the whole company and justify why you haven’t hit target. My self esteem was shot to bits and when I left the company after 2 years he bullied me out of money I was rightfully owed. Unlimited holiday benefit is a lie. Unless you are running 10k a week, your holiday request will be frowned upon (I had a total of 18 days leave across 2 whole years!). Hours of time outside of work spent at events etc is expected and again, frowned upon if you don’t attend. Horrid remarks about candidates from minority groups were always banded around the office (dressed up as “bants”). There are so so so many other things I could say about SR2, but TLDR: avoid at all costs.

avatar
SR2 Response
1y
First and foremost, we’re glad to hear that you appreciated having dogs in the office. This has been a long-standing part of our culture, and we’re thrilled that it contributed positively to your time here. The feedback we receive from various team members has affirmed that this is something that brings joy and comfort to the workplace which we are all for! However, we were particularly concerned about some of the comments you made regarding how personal issues and leave were handled during your time with us. We take matters related to employee well-being very seriously, and in situations where team members have faced personal hardships, such as illness, loss, or other tragic circumstances, we have always endeavoured to provide them with full support. This support has included extended leave with full pay, counselling services, and a very flexible approach to time off, often well beyond what is legally required or what our internal policies outline. We’ve had several cases over the years where individuals have gone through incredibly difficult personal situations and we have offered them as much time, space and support they need to take care of themselves and their families, without any impact on their holiday allowance or pay. We believe this is part of our commitment to supporting our people in times of need, and we are proud of the way we've handled these situations for our team members going through times of personal difficulty. We appreciate the sensitivity of these situations and we make sure individual privacy is always respected and adhered to, which might mean you were unaware of how such matters are handled, but we want to clarify that this support has always been a priority for us. As for the comment about standing in front of the company to justify why someone didn’t hit their targets, we would like to address this directly. This has never, and will never, be part of our sales process or culture at SR2 and simply hasn’t happened, ever. While we are a sales-oriented business and performance is an important part of our operations, we believe in fostering a supportive and constructive environment. Regarding the claim of being "bullied out of money rightfully owed," we take such accusations very seriously. We have a standard procedure in place for handling the departure of any employee, and we ensure that all entitlements are paid in full according to our contractual terms and obligations post-resignation. We are confident that our processes are both fair and transparent, and we would be more than happy to discuss any specific instances privately if there was a misunderstanding regarding your departure. As a socially responsible business and B Corp, we are deeply concerned by your comment regarding "horrid remarks about candidates from minority groups". Such behaviour is entirely against our values and we are sorry if you witnessed or experienced behaviour that went against these principles during your time with us. We are fully committed to fostering a workplace environment that is inclusive, respectful, and welcoming to everyone which includes our employees, candidates and clients we work with. We take this accusation very seriously and want to make it extremely clear that we do not, and will never, condone or tolerate any remarks or behaviours that are discriminatory or disrespectful toward minority groups or any other individuals we work with in our line of work. Finally, the statement about holiday leave - claiming only 18 days holidays were taken across two years - is particularly troubling for us to hear. This would not only be against our leave policies, but it would also be considerably under the legal entitlement. Even when unlimited holiday allowances were in place in the past, we implemented a minimum threshold to ensure everyone took adequate time off, including an additional day off for birthdays and a company-wide shutdown over the Christmas period. This is something we actively monitored to ensure no one missed out on their deserved break and that all SR2 team members took enough holiday that was above the legal entitlement and supported their well-being. We appreciate you bringing these concerns to our attention. While we cannot agree with some of the statements made, we do want to acknowledge that your perception of your experience is valid to you, and we’re sorry that it wasn’t more positive. Your feedback helps us better understand how we can improve communication around our policies and support systems so that all team members feel heard and cared for. Thank you again for your time and contributions to SR2 and we wish you all the best in your future endeavours.
1.0
5 Aug 2024

Awful

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dogs are allowed in the office. That's it.

Cons

Run by a terrible human being who paints a very different picture of himself on LinkedIn - virtue signalling is the understatement of the century. The place is just awful, avoid at all costs.

avatar
SR2 Response
1y
Thanks for taking the time to leave us some feedback. Positive or critical, it’s appreciated and helps us so we can improve and grow as a business. Let’s start with the positive. It’s great to hear you enjoyed having dogs in the office. Big thumbs up from us also and it’s great to know that was a positive part of your experience with the business and we’re happy to confirm that we’ll continue to offer dog-friendly office space to our team where we can going forward. Regarding some of the concerns you’ve raised, we’ve reviewed our records and it appears we don’t have any former employees who were with the company for over five years and have since left. That being said, we understand everyone’s experience is unique, albeit it’s difficult to reconcile this with the experience you’ve described and we're sorry if your time at SR2 wasn’t as positive as we would have hoped. While we recognise that individual circumstances can vary, and some former employees may wish to remain anonymous in their feedback, the timeline referenced does not align with our records, but regardless of the specific details, we are committed to hearing and considering feedback that could help us improve our workplace. Our CEO, like any leader, has faced difficult decisions over the past few years due to unprecedented global challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our industry followed by a global recession that we are still in. The reality is that steering a company through such turbulent times is difficult, even NIKE are 30% down, and it inevitably it involves making tough calls for the greater good of the business that may not always be popular or well-received, and we acknowledge that this can leave differing impressions on those affected. That said, I want to assure you that we strive to create a positive, inclusive, and supportive environment for all team members, even during challenging times. While we may not always get everything right, we are continuously working to learn from feedback and adapt our practices to better support our people. With regard to the personal comments made about our CEO, we understand that strong emotions can arise from difficult experiences. However, we encourage feedback to remain respectful and constructive, as this helps foster an environment where meaningful improvements can be made. In closing, we want to express our sincere gratitude for your time with us and for your feedback. Every perspective, including yours, is valuable to us in understanding how we can continue to grow as a business and support our team more effectively. We wish you nothing but the best in your future career.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 33 Reviews

Glassdoor has 33 SR2 reviews submitted anonymously by SR2 employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SR2 is right for you.