employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Scientific American

Is this your company?

Scientific American Reviews

3.1

27% would recommend to a friend

(11 total reviews)

Joachim Krieger

Not enough data to show CEO approval

7% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

11 reviews
4.0
26 Dec 2025

Competent people, good processes, business outlook strongly negative

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hybrid work schedule. Smart, mostly hardworking people. New editor-in-chief has a strategy.

Cons

Cannot stress enough how negative the business outlook is. And as a second class citizen of the parent company Springer Nature there is really nowhere for you to go if and when this subsidiary publication goes the way of the dodo and/or additional layoffs are needed to survive. It's a crowded space in a shrinking market (see Popular Science, New Scientist, Science News, American Scientist, for example) and the product is poorly differentiated with several politically related embarrassments to its name. It enjoys a modicum of the respect and attention it once did in the age before social media.

2.0
21 Apr 2022

None

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work was very interesting

Cons

The employees weren’t very friendly

2.0
13 Dec 2018

publishing

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

found the work to be interesting

Cons

did not think the people were nice

Viewing 1 - 3 of 11 Reviews

Glassdoor has 18 Scientific American reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific American employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific American is right for you.