Seneca Global Reviews

4.6

94% would recommend to a friend

(233 total reviews)

Edward V. Szofer

100% approve of CEO

91% positive business outlook

Seneca Global has an employee rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars, based on 233 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Seneca Global employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

233 reviews
1.0
25 July 2018

Glassdoor manipulations on rise

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dedicated team with an AVP incharge is setup for glassdoor

Cons

The target set for the team is to bring up the rating and so get fake reviews written by employees. The current emoloyees are held up under the managers for their hikes , promotions etc. So it is just a matter of putting some pressure and handing a carrot to get positive reviews written out. This substantially manipulation of actual facts so as to show the company good (in reality it is horrible ) is merely act of fraud just like the timesheet fraud or billing fraud . The rating given to ceo is also not right. Rao is not the ceo. His rating can not be hundred percent as many people i know have given poor rating for him. His rating is been taken out as it is nkt relavant and now it is again brought back through some manipulation of glassdoor. This is bad...

avatar
Seneca Global Response
7y
I would like to thank you for taking the time to post the review. You seem to be really worried about our Glassdoor ratings and my own ratings above anything else, as you have even mentioned my name. It is clear that you completely lack any understanding of our business and how we operate. All of our teams are fully dedicated and work directly with the clients on a daily basis. It is really sad that one can make these false statements under the cover of anonymity. Our real ratings come from extensive third party audits like the recent one from the Great Place To Work institute, where we are ranked among the top 50 mid-size companies in India across all sectors. It is not often that a company gets to top 50 in the first assessment. If you really work at SenecaGlobal as your post claims, you would know that 93% of our associates endorse SenecaGlobal as a High Trust and High-Performance organization, while 91% of the associates have expressed their intent to work towards a long-term career with us. I challenge you to post your name and make these statements, if there is any truth to your statements.
1.0
22 Mar 2018

Process mental block

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Defined process, however it works

Cons

Process mental block If you have a hammer in hand, everything that you see looks like a nail. There is a register for every fart, hiccup and cough. There is a document/form for every step. Most often these document formats clumsy, non-standard and never seen/heard off in the industry because someone who created these in first place was either smoking or just copied them from somewhere without due diligence. For example, they want each code review comment to be entered into JIRA as a separate bug. Anyone with little knowledge of development would know how difficult it is. In the beginning of the projects, as we are discovering the right coding standards and guidelines, there would be quite a few review comments and eventually when everyone one the team is up to date with what is expected, the review comments would dies down to almost none. Majority of review comments are of improvement in nature and does not qualify as bugs. Most importantly GIT already provides option to comment/track review comments. If the idea is to not lose track of things, these tools perfectly apt and around the world these are heavily used. But they wanted JIRA items so they can measure and quantify the improvement in quality with time. Its like plucking hair on eggs. Anything can be done, provided you have unlimited time, energy and resources to do so. The CLIENTS who are paying for the projects NEVER ASKED FOR IT. Clients don't event know where their time is going off. Client wants minimal process, so they can focus on productivity, technology, gotomarket and the fracking offshore company wants to show-off value audition by fitting in a rigorous process, end of the day the employees are struggling through two different directions and goals. You can provide value add when you have additional time and resources on hand until then you have to take care of client expectations. If informed to client, it will be huge conflict so the leads never let the client know how much of process overhead they are taking. The WHOLE EFFORT IN PROCESS IS COMING OF CLIENT BILLING WITHOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE. The team spends 3-4 hours sitting in monthly review meetings and another 1-2days preparing the data before the meeting and few hours each day logging/gathering data. While it is possible to add extra members to the team, the core members are knowledgeable and responsible for everything including technology, deliverables and the fracking process. So the team gets mentally harassed juggling through multiple goals and stuck between client deliverables and internal process The FOCUS OF EMPLOYEES GOES AWAY from being tech savvy (leaning new technologies, taking new automation initiatives etc) , being more productive to taking care of nitty-gitty activities. Especially since there is a LOT OF FEAR IN EMPLOYEES to take care of local operations head, they compromise client expectations to meet local goals eventually leading to loss of projects. The loss of projects is used as a reason again to fit even stronger process leading to vicious spiral and continuous mental harassment to employees. While they say the process can be customized and they blackmail the leads to not do so quoting that if you do so and the project gets into crisis, you will be screwed for deviation/customization of standard process. In fact it is done so often and so openly that none of the teams go for customization. The project managers and delivery head are sitting ducks as they cant mess with process team.

avatar
Seneca Global Response
8y
First, I would like to thank you for taking the time to post a detailed response. I also apologize for the late response, I have been constantly traveling for the past few weeks (and for the next few). As you are someone who has been in the system, I am assuming you are fully aware that the so called ‘process’ we follow here at SenecaGlobal is merely good engineering and project management practices. You should also be aware that every project or team has the freedom to choose what works for them and their client, as long as the fundamentals (e.g., productivity, quality, reliability, scalability and traceability) are not compromised. Of course, such ‘tailoring’ requires certain levels of maturity and experience. We have a system in place where the processes are subservient to the people. If there are specific instances or ideas that can add value to the clients, we are here to adopt them as you should know. I am always available to look into these things (along with the team) and that would have been a constructive way to address any issue that might exist. I am afraid the way you went about things here shows a clear intent to defame individuals or the organization and shows no intent to solve any issue. I am not suggesting that SenecaGlobal is perfect (no organization is), but any isolated issues (with regard to any project) do not give the right to anyone to malign a successful organization and a successful individual. Of course, I have no way to verify if you are still part of the system or you are a disgruntled ex-employee (though you clearly know who I am – talk about a fair game).
1.0
24 June 2017

Inconsistent HR policies

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Stepping stone, not a long term career

Cons

Lot of people have been asked to leave recently. Many people are been given 0% hike instead of good performance and ADR review Same rating, same experience some people get hike and some don't get anything. Exit time some people get 2 months notice period money and some get 3 months and 1 or 2 people got 6 months notice period salary Leaves are significantly lower than other standard companies In general there is lot of negativity all across, there is an employee union being setup. New joiners don't know all this and join without sufficient knowledge and are stuck

avatar
Seneca Global Response
8y
I am afraid I need to agree with your comment on “inconsistent HR policies”, as some of our policies are “not necessarily consistent with the general industry”. Here are few I can think of right away: 1) We have the same vacation/leave policy, medical/life benefits for ALL associates regardless of their title/tenure; 2) We continue to make huge investments in in skill development, including those outside current work and the soft skills like communication; 3) We do not take a bond from any associate, in fact I never have in the ~20 years of building/operating global delivery centers from India; 4) We do not send people to US for any client work and hire only local talent in US and India; 5) We make skill development (in relevant areas) mandatory for promotions, as we want all our associates to have careers; 6) I personally meet with EVERY associate one-on-one once an year, though there are many other forums where I interact with everyone. In a business where people are the only asset, it is not in the interest of any organization to underpay good talent and the 0% hike means something. It is time for people interested in careers to take the skill development seriously. Otherwise, we won’t survive as individuals or as organizations. While this reality may be harsh, it is very true for our business and our world. Yes, we decided to pay “beyond” the notice period in few cases to provide additional assistance where needed. I do not believe that can be categorized as a negative thing. Every year, we review our vacation/leave policy to make sure it is consistent with the industry (though there is still variance from one organization to another). However, review it again with the team, though I cannot promise any changes.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 233 Reviews

Glassdoor has 250 Seneca Global reviews submitted anonymously by Seneca Global employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Seneca Global is right for you.