employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Sightline Media Group

Is this your company?

Sightline Media Group Reviews

2.4

26% would recommend to a friend

(67 total reviews)

Michael Reinstein

15% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

Sightline Media Group has an employee rating of 2.4 out of 5 stars, based on 67 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Sightline Media Group employee rating is 35% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

67 reviews
1.0
13 Apr 2016

You don't want to work here

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you have no options and no job and you are living on the street in a cardboard box wondering how your going to get your next meal, working here is better than that. For all other people, this place is burning down. We were recently sold by a media empire to a not-media-empire. Why would a not-media-empire want a media empires castoffs? Because they own some other junk media, and they want to combine this junk with that junk and make a Big Junk Media Junkyard. Then they can cut even further (over 50 people fired this year) and turn a big profit on a little investment. Plus, Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post and Chris Hughes bought the New Republic, so owning a Junk Media Junkyard is now everyone percenters dream, like driving a Buggati or vacationing in San Trope. Trophy wife with a silicone rack? Check. Donation to Donald Trump? Check. Junk Media Junkyard to show your buddies? Check. The only pro to coming to work here now is that they basically only fire people who have worked here for a long time, so you'll enjoy some job security for a year while you quickly realize you made a terrible mistake.

Cons

Everything here is cons. Between the firings and the people fleeing to other things, the situation is only getting worse. One VP just didn't show up for work anymore. It's that bad. So, naturally the saying is "give it time" but I'm already here so ok, time while I apply for jobs. You are not here already, so don't come here. Give it time, come here like five years from now if it still exists.

1.0
25 Jan 2019

Treading water

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The truth: if you filter out the arguments and confusion, do your tasks, go home and look for the next opportunity, it ain't that hard. Military Times and Defense News have deep tradition and topics are interesting. There is good work being done by journalists. Some managers are good ppl trying to look out for their staff but are limited because they can't make decisions or set course. There are some nice co-workers, some ppl who have been here forever and block out the noise, and a lot of suck ups, just like anywhere. Pay is adequate to average, not as bad as some say but with wide gaps between ppl doing same type job. LA ownership is vile and repulsive when they slither in, but they're not around much. Which is a good thing.

Cons

The truth: there's little spirit or sincerity left in the company. The absentee owners play nickel and dime media mogul but are cash poor bottom feeders who prey on failing businesses, drain the cash and don't invest back unless forced to. "My laptop is completely broke." Just getting expenses and bills paid is an unpleasant adventure. There is no HR person because who would want that job here? So the best managers are left to make excuses and cover up lies. The worst managers have their own agenda and suck up accomplishing nothing or work on pet projects. There's one senior manager whose only job is to kiss up to owners and run around town taking selfies and acting pompous (what's the job description for that?) Continuing cuts and attrition in talent which is demotivating. Constant reorganization to cut costs. It's a paycheck, not a career move.

1.0
5 Apr 2016

Bad leadership for decades.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not many. The work was alright. Some groups had good rapport with one another. That is about it.

Cons

Leadership - CEO and Editor in Chief - Over the last few decades ran the company into the ground. They dug a hole the company has not been able to pull itself out of. The company was not doing well in the late 90s, but since 2001 with multiple wars were being waged, the money was rolling in by the truckload But, leadership decided that was time to invest in anything they felt like, except the company. They had flawed products, outdated products, flawed processes, and ineffective management - as well as many crappy workers - but leadership literally had no business sense. One was an editor, the other a sales person. Together, they didn't know how to lead a company, let alone keep up with the challenges of the digital era and new competition. So, they spent the last decade and a half going whichever way the wind blew. If a buddy or contact met them at a trade show and said "I'd like to see xyz," With not a single ounce of research or planning, they would start building a whole new product based on that conversation. If we were lucky, it was based on "multiple" conversations. Because "my contact who is a so-and-so said we should be doing this, and I thought it was a great idea." Or, "I want to build an XYZ, so let's build an XYZ and launch it in 6 months." I am not kidding the EIC, said in a meeting once - almost verbatim: "A friend of mine met with me at the Paris Air Show, he's a blah blah at ABC Co. He asked me if we do social media outreach. I had to say 'No.' We should start offering social media marketing services to other companies because they need it. " ... What? We are a news company, not a marketing agency. We didn't even have OUR OWN social media team - we had a couple editors who knew how to post on Twitter. How are we supposed to offer social marketing services? Yet, he made a plan for the company's rebirth over the next several years with "social media services" as the cornerstone. WHY?! So, when all was said and done, $50K or 100K into a failed product they'd shutter it, furlough everyone for a week, and fire some people to make up for the mistake. Not once did they think - "Maybe shooting from the hip is a bad idea." Nope, they doubled down on even dumber products. Like throwing hail marys with a blindfold on. TEGNA finally fired the CEO after a botched reorg and got a new one in 2014. He was more responsive and forward thinking, but sought consensus to a fault. The new guy couldn't make a decision to save a life. If he did make a decision, it came only after months of redundant committee meetings. Then he wouldn't hold anyone accountable to the plans! So all the leftover cronies and bad elements that were still doing bbq's at the old leadership's homes, continued to refuse to adapt and blatantly disregarded plans for change - and even wrote letters to the CEO about how they were not going to do what he wanted. Not only did they get to stay and further screw everyone else over, they even got bonuses and raises while the company was barely breaking even. Some other people in that same year 2015 got 1% raises - 1%!! And that was the first raise most of them got in 9 years! Completely ridiculous. Now in 2016, after TWO reorgs, TWO CEOs, and TWO layoffs in as many years, the company was sold, and guess what - MORE LAYOFFS and another new CEO. Not to mention there has been an exodus over the last year of not less than 45 people leaving on their own accord - some without jobs to go to. It's a mess. And it's very sad. It was a company with great potential that was squandered by arrogant, short-sighted, and selfish leadership.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 67 Reviews

Glassdoor has 71 Sightline Media Group reviews submitted anonymously by Sightline Media Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Sightline Media Group is right for you.