employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Simcere Pharmaceutical Group

Is this your company?

Simcere Pharmaceutical Group Reviews

2.5

26% would recommend to a friend

(35 total reviews)

Ren Jinsheng

21% approve of CEO

19% positive business outlook

Simcere Pharmaceutical Group has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 35 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Simcere Pharmaceutical Group employee rating is 29% below average for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

35 reviews
1.0
18 Mar 2021

Do something before HR sinks this ship

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Compensation: The one star is for the pay. They will pay about 1.5-2x higher than market price for R&D positions. For those out there focused on short term gains, this is a great place for you, take advantage of that. You are looking at for example SRA positions in the six figure range. Of course this only applies to you if you have a U.S citizenship. For employees who are Chinese nationals and require visa sponsorships, unfortunately you will have to accept below market pay for about 20-40%.

Cons

Career growth:
 For those who actually care about career progression/growth, please do your due diligence before coming here. On the R&D side, if you are not a PI or above, you will be treated like a hired hand. You will be strongly encouraged to work on weekends and holidays to generate data but only to have your data taken away and analyzed by your project leads. If you have a PhD, then that’s even more unfortunate, because no one wants to hear your ideas. Your PI’s just want a report that does what he/she is told. This way they can blatantly take credit for your work products cause frankly some of the PI’s (yes multiple) have less scientific acumen and technical skills than you do. On the operations side, this doesn’t even matter because they are dropping like flies.
 Management: Current management team is run by HR. Seems like a RED FLAG when an organization lets the HR person run the show, rather than the COO or the CSO. HR is directly responsible for the company’s high turnover because they terminate people on a whim for personal vendettas but at the same time unable to hire replacements with any real qualifications. Thus resorting to going way above market comp to sign new employees which exacerbates current employee resentment. Culture: Toxic work environment. Year to date turnover rate is 82%. HR formed a culture committee in mid 2020 to address the issue of bad culture, however, the committee only had one kickoff meeting so far. I think this echoes the sentiment from a previous review, that management only cares about appearances, and not for any real change. Collaboration doesn't exist, every PI fends for themselves and some PIs even forbid their team members to talk to people from other teams. People’s performance reviews are based on favoritism, thus your direct manager's “opinion” is taken as the absolute truth. They make you fill out your KPI’s and annual performance goals just for record keeping, no one even reads them. In reality your performance is based entirely on the line manager’s personal opinion rather than how you actually measured up to your annual goals nor the company’s overall performance.

1.0
13 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Due to the ongoing and voluntary mass exodus of employees from the company, multiple positions are most likely available. This has allowed new researchers/scientist at all levels the potential opportunity to learn a variety of new skills including: procurement, biosafety hood repair, technical support, and facilities maintenance. On a slightly different perspective, the free coffee in the break room is not monitored as much as the snacks management provides.

Cons

The most unprofessional work environment I have ever been apart of. Employees are treated as objects with zero regards to their health or well-being. This atitidue was on display during the Covid pandemic when multiple employees feared for their job safety when voicing concerns about continuing to work over 40+ hours a week despite Governor Baker’s mandates throughout. Instead of implementing and adhering to social distancing, shift work, or alternative scheduling, management deemed it better to provide Vitamin-C gummies and continue as though nothing was happening. More recent efforts to address company culture and the work place environment have seemingly fallen on deaf ears. Lengthy “town halls” filled with vague terms and highlighted words from someone’s “Human Resources 101” textbook have left many wondering if they simply don’t understand how to run a company or if they don’t care enough. Investment in employees is also shockingly absent. From looking for ways to bypass 401K matching to instructing employees to search YouTube instead of hiring field application scientists, if something does not directly contribute to the overall image of the company it won’t be considered. When looking for new career opportunities I was asked why I was looking. I found it hard to summarize or adequately relay some of the events that transpired... -Everyday common stock lab supplies routinely running out due to invoices not being paid. -Having your time in the office “secretly” noted by HR despite staying well past normal working hours to complete experiments. -Being reported as “late” for arriving at 9:10 and being asked to take PTO. -Cherry picking of data to exacerbate project success. Or even just the general disrespect towards researchers. If the BIC wasn’t backed by a large Chinese pharmaceutical company, I don’t believe they would have made it this long. Incompetence runs rampant among most of the company (including researchers) and many employees are just waiting for their promised 20% bonus. While they may offer slightly higher compensation for a given position, I would strongly consider weighing all the options before joining on.

1.0
13 Sept 2020

Avoid Simcere Innovation

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They hire people immediately out of school apparently associated with any type of Ivy League or prestigious school association.

Cons

It is difficult for me to express the magnitude of my displeasure with Simcere Innovation. I would not recommend this company to anyone. First, and most egregiously, the company required some employees to continue working daily during the Covid-19 shutdown, despite not working on Covid-related research. Much of this work was performed within small rooms with multiple people present at once. Also, as a response to initial concerns about working during the early Covid outbreak, the company handed out Vitamin C ‘gummies’ and demanded employees be present for normal work hours. I would like to remind others that this was a time when, as a good gesture to employees, many other biotech firms not working on Covid-19 paused operations. Additionally, I feel that the hiring process was not honest. For example, candidates were told during recruitment that they would be hired as full-time employees with benefits from the start, but essentially were hired as ‘work-to hire’ for a 6-month initial time-period. Some were also told verbally they would receive stock, while stock options were not available for this company. In addition, be advised that Simcere Innovation is a not a biotech ‘startup’ in the traditional sense, but part of a large Chinese Pharmaceutical company. Management reports to the headquarters in China, and many strategic and scientific decisions are made without input from scientist and senior-scientist’s input at the Boston location. Furthermore, there seems to be an absence of meritocratic decision making and appreciation for performance among management. Much of the work is done by a few people, while some have been allowed to exert minimal effort. This seems to depend on which group employees join. Some groups get away with doing absolutely nothing and never presenting any data. Other groups present the same data over and over again with no one seeming to notice. Other groups are expected to work nonstop. There are 5 groups in the company. Good luck choosing where you land. In short, do yourself a favor and avoid this company.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 35 Reviews

Glassdoor has 39 Simcere Pharmaceutical Group reviews submitted anonymously by Simcere Pharmaceutical Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Simcere Pharmaceutical Group is right for you.