Start Early Reviews

3.5

63% would recommend to a friend

(70 total reviews)
avatar

Diana Rauner

59% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Start Early has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 70 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Start Early employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

70 reviews
1.0
17 Mar 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits and generally higher pay for almost all positions compared to other early childhood and HHS nonprofits. Most of my coworkers were very passionate and intelligent people who I got along with well and learned a lot from.

Cons

Within Start Early, there is a culture of perfection and nonstop work that is extremely toxic. Managers have too much on their plates to be able to supervise effectively. Senior leadership's communication is cold, corporate, and out of touch with their workforce, and they do not seem interested in coordinating work across the organization, only acquiring new projects and starting new business development initiatives. You might even forget they are a nonprofit given the emphasis internally on building training products, marketing materials, sales pipelines, etc. Senior leadership has been on a multi-year campaign to convince employees that they center DEIB and are committed to rooting out white supremacist values from the workplace culture, but there is little evidence that anything they are trying is working. The workplace is still predominantly white, and there is literally physical segregation within the organization - the nice glitzy office downtown is where the white folks work, and the early childhood center on the South Side is where the black and brown folks work. There were opportunities for integration but no effort at actual inclusion was apparent. All in all, the only thing Start Early has going for it is its massive wealth. I have no doubt this is because the president is a white, neoliberal aristocrat who excels at talking out both sides of her mouth. For example, when we agreed to share decision making powers with partners in the Educare Learning Network, and learned that they might vote to divest it from Start Early, her response was "over my dead body," despite our organization having made a prior commitment to share decision-making authority. This was just a drop in the bucket of bad faith and dysfunctional relationships Start Early has with its close partners. Behind closed doors, the leaders of Start Early will absolutely trash you if you cross them. I spent my tenure at Start Early in the Educare Learning Network program. I will say that the culture of the ELN program is better and ELN leadership does successfully foster a more inclusive and diverse culture. However, the ELN program is in disarray - they are scrambling for funding as their anchor investments are reduced year-after-year and the costs of running and maintaining a nationwide network of 25+ high quality early childhood centers increases. Several schools in the network were struggling for financial solvency before the pandemic, and the situation is much worse now. It often feels like a sinking ship, and this is not helped at all by the fact that Start Early leadership continues to expand the ELN national program without expanding the staff capacity in the ELN division. There is not even a discussion about succession planning for the leadership of ELN, and the current ED, although a passionate leader who I deeply respect, is clearly thinking about retirement. Further, the ELN just spent an arm and a leg on consultants to produce a strategic plan for the next 3-5 years, and the result was a vague series of objectives that were just restatements of work the network has been doing for the past decade. There is an incredible amount of wheel-spinning going on here as folks clamor for some pathway toward a sustainable purpose and vision for the ELN. Regarding internal mechanics of the ELN team, my experience in the division was marked by siloing, disorganization, a lack of operational coordination on tactical goals, and lack of any meaningful routes for advancement or professional development. These are, however, problems within the whole organization, so I do not fault the ELN team for these things. There is little to no operational oversight from the org for each division. I do want to emphasize that my colleagues were extremely intelligent, caring, and awesome people who were a pleasure to work with. You will definitely find good people and lifelong connections here. People genuinely care about how you are doing, and there is awareness of the toxic culture, and that is good, but I found that discussions about the problems with the culture often would take place with a foreboding, ominous current running underneath - that something is deeply wrong and we all were powerless to change it. I don't recommend working here. This is the type of org that attracts sycophants who cater to the beck and call of the top executives. Anyone with integrity is either gone or jaded by the end of their first year.

2.0
17 Mar 2022

Potential exists, but toxic culture must change

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Well-funded national non-profit Many mission-driven staff who genuinely care about improving early childhood systems. Educare Learning Network team is high functioning.

Cons

The org is made up of different teams and programs that function almost like their own orgs. They have not figured out how to create a unified org that is all going in the same direction. Very siloed. Culture is fear-based and has many white supremacy cultural characteristics (perfectionism, worship of the written word, sense of urgency, quantity over quality, paternalism, power hoarding, fear of open conflict, progress is bigger/more) New leaders who are brought in to help make positive change are not properly supported which hinders their ability to make a positive impact. They need to be open with new leaders about the current state of things and provide guides/mentors who can help new hires navigate the org and political environment. A lot of the work depends on a strong technology strategy, but the infrastructure and investment in technology and management of systems does not match the stated goals.

2.0
29 Jan 2019

Finance Dept

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are many dedicated people working at the Ounce. It was once a great place to work.

Cons

New management has destroyed what was once a great place to work. Staff no longer work as a team. The atmosphere and pressures have divided staff and people are generally over worked, underappreciated, and bullied into compliance. Not all rules apply to staff equally and people are treated unfairly. The Ounce spends a lot of money on technology instead of those they serve. There are probably three executives for every lower grade staff member. Only executives are supported and the people who do all the work are not valued

Viewing 1 - 3 of 70 Reviews

Glassdoor has 74 Start Early reviews submitted anonymously by Start Early employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Start Early is right for you.