employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Strategic Capacity Group

Is this your company?

Strategic Capacity Group Reviews

2.1

27% would recommend to a friend

(32 total reviews)

33% positive business outlook

Strategic Capacity Group has an employee rating of 2.1 out of 5 stars, based on 32 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Strategic Capacity Group employee rating is 44% below average for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

32 reviews
1.0
15 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting passport stamps, some good people who will suffer alongside you, marketable experience to write in your resume while you're trying to find a new job.

Cons

The ‘leadership’ acts with impunity and will fire someone for no reason (other than they feel like it.) Employees are terminated without any warning and SCG refuses to pay out unused vacation; referring to a ‘policy’. They have no conscience! Those who are not fired do not stick around very long. Employees, even those with decades of experience, are treated like children. The turnover is ridiculously high – even the founder’s husband did not stay. Long hours are required to accomplish the work (which is paid for by taxpayers) and employees are unable take time off which is how SCG is able to steal the unused vacation time. There have been poor reviews here from the start and while the C-suite member over Finance responds, there was/is failure at every level to take corrective action to solve the actual problems

1.0
19 Mar 2022

Immature ‘leadership’ running a toxic environment.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Appears to have a good mission.

Cons

The ‘leadership’ acts with impunity and will fire someone for no reason (other than they feel like it.) Employees are terminated without any warning and SCG refuses to pay out unused vacation; referring to a ‘policy’. They have no conscience! Those who are not fired do not stick around very long. Employees, even those with decades of experience, are treated like children. Employees must quickly learn that the CEO/President is the only one allowed to have ideas or solutions. The turnover is ridiculously high – even the founder’s husband did not stay. Long hours are required to accomplish the work (which is paid for by taxpayers) and employees are unable take time off which is how SCG is able to steal the unused vacation time. There have been poor reviews here from the start and while the C-suite member over Finance responds, there was/is failure at every level to take corrective action to solve the actual problems. The CEO/President repeatedly called a WOC lazy (she was not) in three consecutive meetings and the only action taken - the WOC was fired.

1.0
25 Jan 2022

Run away, run away

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice gym in the building. But people don't join or stay with organizations because of nice gyms and snacks and happy hours and fancy office buildings. They stay because the management actually takes their ideas seriously and listens. They stay because hard work and achievement are rewarded, not brown nosing, and because their supervisors stand up for them. They stay because supervisors and management actually try to get to know them and their challenges, and put their employees' needs above the client's -- the way you get good service for clients is to treat your employees well. They stay because they get meaningful mentoring not unprofessional demeaning feedback that doesn't help them grow.

Cons

Leadership talks the talk, but does not walk the walk. Entire leadership team has no idea what they're doing in development work or how to manage people or develop and retain staff (mostly academics or people who worked for mom and pop non-profits before, oh, wait, this is a mom and pop non-profit, literally). They create a toxic work environment by micro-managing and picking favorites who are not necessarily qualified over people who are actually doing a good job. One senior manager did not know what 2CFR200 was, although 99% of the funding is USG grants and cooperative agreements. Implementation model is a complete waste of taxpayers' money and out of step with the prevailing wisdom of participatory design and partner-led programming. 99% turnover over the last 3 years, and everyone I know is looking for another job so they can leave before they get fired, which inevitably happens when you fall out of favor with the leadership for some reason that has nothing to do with the quality of your work. Or before someone else gets promoted for no reason when you work your butt off and can't get promoted. And there is no performance management system -- going back to talk the talk and not walk the walk. Governance of the organization is totally out of line with accepted non-profit practices with at least two members of upper management also serving on the Board. Bottom line, unless you're desperate and need a stepping stone to somewhere else, if you're a development professional with some degree of self-respect and pride in your profession or someone looking to get into it, stay away. If I could give it negative stars I would.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 32 Reviews

Glassdoor has 32 Strategic Capacity Group reviews submitted anonymously by Strategic Capacity Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Strategic Capacity Group is right for you.