3.0
42% would recommend to a friend
Matt Curl
57% approve of CEO
42% positive business outlook
Pros
Standard process, welcoming people. Overall not too challenging.
Cons
The office was a bit small at the time.
Pros
Decent product - if only the product team could execute.
Cons
Tessera Data is by far this is the worst company I've been associated with! The Head of Sales speaks negatively to everyone and about everyone, yells and doesn't know the first thing about sales - literally takes credit for closing deals for people that quit (they quit because of him). The Head of Product gives little direction and doesn't listen to what customers want/need. The Head of Marketing loves a good webinar and that's all - zero demand generation.
Pros
*The pay is good for newcomers *The benefits are good *You can learn the work pretty quickly if you don't mind asking everyone for help. *In general, your coworkers will emanate a positive and friendly atmosphere.
Cons
*HR is not there for you, if you have any issues, as long as it isn't related to management, you can ask you manager for help on how to proceed, otherwise, pray that you get transferred to a different team with a different manager next quarter. *There's always this pressure on everyone that you should be doing more work than what you've been hired to do, the so called "High performance culture" *You'll never feel that management is sincere, you will only get the usual corpo responses from them, even if it is a blatant lie. *Metrics are ambiguous as they can be, so you're actually at your managers mercy when its about performance, you could be thinking that you're doing great and next month you're in a PIP. *PIPs lack clear metrics or defined goals, leaving employees in ambiguity. The expectation to 'do better next quarter' creates an easy termination 'paper trail' without tangible benchmarks to refute. *You'll never feel safe/stable enough that you could be sincere with management, anything could put you on a "watch/black list", *Vertical mobbing is common enough that some say that their managers are helping them perform better. *While the company professes concern for employee well-being, practical experiences reveal a disconnect. Personal issues affecting performance, such as illness or bereavement, are met with negative evaluations. Rather than offering support, there's an emphasis on working harder, implying that personal challenges adversely impact team performance. This contradiction raises questions about the genuine commitment to employee welfare. *All tasks, regardless of complexity, are assigned equal importance. Individuals focusing on quick and straightforward tasks are often perceived as more productive than those tackling slower, more challenging assignments. The emphasis leans heavily towards quantity over the nature of the tasks. *When an employee identifies a potential issue that could have future repercussions, instead of addressing it, it gets ignored. Promises are made to 'see about it,' but unfortunately, no actions are taken until something breaks. *The workload leaves little room for self-directed learning, despite the company offering opportunities for improvement through a learning stipend or other benefits. Unfortunately, the demanding workload often discourages employees from utilizing these opportunities, as the better choice is to either rest or continue working, leading to a significant professional stagnation. *This situation fosters an environment where, despite your best efforts, there's a perpetual sense of inadequacy and constant concern about being the next one facing layoffs.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.