employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The HistoryMakers

Is this your company?

The HistoryMakers Reviews

3.1

41% would recommend to a friend

(38 total reviews)

Julieanna L. Richardson

43% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

The HistoryMakers has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 38 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The The HistoryMakers employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

38 reviews
1.0
13 June 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There really isn't much to say that is positive about working at The HistoryMakers. I've never been so humiliated and demoralized as much as I had been when working there. The only positive experience I had there was when I left.

Cons

This is the most difficult job I have ever had. The work in itself was not difficult, but the Executive Director is solely responsible for the difficulty. She will insult you and mistreat you simply because it is a part of her personality. I would work lengthy days (as much as 14 hours) and would be reprimanded for taking lunch or requesting a break from the heavy work load. Since moving on, I have been employed at other organizations and facilities within Chicago. I have met people in every single place who knew the Executive Director. She had a terrible reputation within non-profits in Chicago because of how she treats people. Unless you are in a position to directly give her money, she will belittle you and your accomplishments. She has a poor history of fostering and maintaining professional relationship. Here is an example. During 2012 and 2013, half a dozen or so academic fellows from the Institute of Museum and Library Services were hired at the organization. All of them except for a few were to work over the summer and then move on to other institutions in other parts of the country when the summer ended. One fellow would stay a The HistoryMakers as a year long fellow. There were two year long fellows in 2011 and one in 2012. All three of them quit because of how the Executive Director treats her staff. The other fellows competed their year but only because they left to work at other places to compete the fellowship. As a result, the organization did not receive funding from IMLS for 2013 and 2014 because of complaints from the fellows. The Executive Director also was denied a grant renewal from the National Science Foundation for her inability to complete grant requirements of her first NSF grant. She always missed deadlines and loses staff on a frequent basis which was a result of her treatment of others. She must clearly be desperate if she is sending trolls to come and rate the organization all five stars and denounce other reviewers who had negative experiences that have become the norm for the organization's work environment. I would hope readers are smarter than to fall for that.

avatar
The HistoryMakers Response
8y
We respect that this was not a good fit for you, but we cannot accept statements here that are slanderous and simply not accurate. The IMLS program graduated 13 fellows who are all now employed as archivists given their training in the program. Also, the IMLS program is still in operation headed by the ED at Harvard, Yale and Emory. In fact, the IMLS took great pride in the program. In terms of the National Science Foundation, this grant funded program and the results of it were highly rated. What trolls are you speaking of? Glassdoor does not allow for trolls.
1.0
20 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is truly amazing! Interviewing people is a skill I enjoyed practicing (just not in this context)

Cons

When I first came across the job posting for the HistoryMakers, I thought the position looked interesting and suited my educational background. The pay was decent too for someone who had just graduated college. When I checked the reviews, I saw that there were some really awful reviews mixed in with some amazing reviews. I was conflicted, but against my better judgment, decided to interview anyway. The interview process was actually fine. There were a few comments made by the interviewer that kind of caught me off guard and were kind of harsh, but I brushed it off. They told me I would be joining them for a trial run so that they could see my performance. Long story short, the trial run was not great to say the least. The executive director constantly monitored and criticized everything I did even though they never trained me. I was always asking for guidance and she behaved as though I should already know what I was doing. Despite this, I was fully hired and decided to stay because I thought it'd get better once I had a better grasp of how to do the work. I was wrong. The environment became worse. I was going home at 10pm and having to arrive at 7am. You're being paid 40,000 dollars a year but working 15 hour shifts. The criticism I received from Julieanna Richardson was not even constructive, it was just insults-- everything from the work that I was doing to completely irrelevant things like the kind of clothes that I wore, the phone that I have, etc. I was afraid to come to work every morning. There are no real lunch breaks. You can eat for 15 minutes, but you'll be working while you do it. And if you take more than two bathroom breaks in a day, Julieanna Richardson will question you. The first time I took three bathroom breaks in one day, she followed me into the bathroom just to monitor me. This job affected my mental health so severely that I sought out a therapist. It wasn't until I was able to see a therapist that the therapist urged me to quit my job. I had nothing lined up, and I was very afraid of the financial loss this would bring me, but the exhaustion, fear, and anxiety that work( esp. J.R.) brought me was taking over every aspect of my life. Even when I would arrive home, all I could think about was work. On weekends, the executive director would text me to my personal phone to complain about the work I had submitted despite me putting my all into the work (and my coworkers assured me I had done a fantastic job). After a few therapy visits, I decided to quit the job. I honestly don't know how the two full time employees who work there have managed to survive such a suffocating atmosphere. This company will not survive without employees. I'm not sure at what point they will realize this and implement the necessary changes, but for now, I can only share my experience. I truly believed it could not possibly be that bad, and I was so wrong. I will always regret not quitting sooner than I did and letting that job ruin every aspect of my life for the short amount of time that it did.

1.0
18 Nov 2013

One day at this place will leave you begging for a job in retail.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good organizational mission, on paper anyway. - Nice coworkers and departmental supervisors.

Cons

- The interview was the most humiliating "professional" experience of my life. The executive director insulted my past work experience as insufficient for the honor of working at her prestigious organization, she questioned my work ethic for not having consistent employment when I was a full-time student, and she continuously interrupted the interview to take phone calls and consult with employees. Yet she hired me on immediately because she was desperate for new labor, given the considerably high turnover rate I would later find out existed. - The work experience here ranged from tedious "busy work" (printing labels, stuffing folders, etc.) to scheduling conference calls with school speakers. She made it clear she was not satisfied with the amount of work I produced, despite not giving me clear instruction whatsoever. Even my departmental supervisors, who were nice people and good workers, didn't have a clue as to what the boss actually wanted. Ironically, she was also a huge micromanager and demanded detailed daily reports from all of the staff and to be CC'd on every single outgoing email, even going as far as to demand one of the coordinators redact an email he sent because it was "unprofessional" (It wasn't). - I'm almost certain the mandated work hours are legally questionable. I was told to come in at 8:30 every morning and I could not leave until at least 6:30 every night. Some nights I was told to work 1-2 hours later and I was also told to expect to be called in on weekends.

avatar
The HistoryMakers Response
7y
We value your input and realize that while it was not a good fit for you...but we also do not agree with your characterization. We are working to put more structures in place for onboarding new employees.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 38 Reviews

Glassdoor has 47 The HistoryMakers reviews submitted anonymously by The HistoryMakers employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The HistoryMakers is right for you.