employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Three Oaks Hospitality

Is this your company?

Three Oaks Hospitality Reviews

1.7

11% would recommend to a friend

(18 total reviews)

Nikki Hamlin

Not enough data to show CEO approval

13% positive business outlook

Three Oaks Hospitality has an employee rating of 1.7 out of 5 stars, based on 18 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The Three Oaks Hospitality employee rating is 54% below average for employers within the Restaurants and food service industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

18 reviews
1.0
5 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Majority of front line employees (servers and bartenders) are great staff and easy to work with.

Cons

Completely toxic culture and environment. Every post you've ever seen about toxic leadership describes the experience of working for this company. The level of abuse, sexism, and narcissistic behavior that is deemed "normal" culture within this company is completely inappropriate and I personally have never been treated with such little respect, as a human, in a professional working environment. All concepts are lead from a place of fear and greed. The expectation that since one C-level exec has chosen to have zero work:life balance (because every employee on payroll is "an idiot who doesn't know how to do their job correctly") no one else should either, and every employee receives the wrath of this Exec's misery. Employees walk on eggshells constantly with the threat of being publicly humiliated. Consistently it was heard that it was upper leadership's goal to make everyone as miserable as possible and that leadership intentionally came down unnecessarily hard on staff so that when a note of positive feedback was given staff would get a high from that nugget of praise. It was a vicious cycle of staff being scared to do anything in fear of a potential mishap and being fired, yet management constantly coming down on staff for not performing the "Three Oaks Way" aka not driving sales performance. At the end of the day it is a business and revenue does impact everything, but leadership should come from a place of respect of people as humans vs. trying to drive sales by demoralizing and degrading individuals into upselling a $4 add-on to a chicken tender tower.

1.0
10 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None to be honest lol.

Cons

Super bad management, not good money, doesn't care for any of their workers,

1.0
7 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The place is beautiful from the outside. Thats about it really.

Cons

1. Severely Dysfunctional Communication Environment: Communication across management is consistently aggressive and confrontational. Employees often feel rushed, dismissed, and unable to express concerns without fear of backlash. The overall tone creates a high-pressure environment where staff feel as though they must “walk on eggshells” simply to communicate basic information. This is not conducive to a functional or healthy workplace. 2. Toxic Leadership at the Executive Level: The COO, Chef Matt, sets a deeply concerning precedent for the company’s culture. His interactions are routinely negative, unprofessional, and antagonistic. Instead of offering constructive feedback, he often targets employees with comments that are discouraging, conflictive and counterproductive. Multiple team members cautioned me about him upon hire, and management openly stated that his behavior is significantly worse toward them. When leadership normalizes this type of conduct, the result is a structurally toxic organization. 3. Disorganized and Divisive Bar Team: The bar team operates without leadership, accountability, or internal respect. Despite my 10+ years of industry experience spanning bartending, serving, and management roles, I have never encountered a team this fragmented. Verbal disputes, gossip, and undermining behavior were commonplace, largely due to a lack of direction and the absence of an experienced bar lead. Team members frequently acted in self-interest rather than working collaboratively, contributing to a consistently unstable and unprofessional environment. 4. Misleading and Inconsistent Hiring Process: The interview process provides minimal context or clarity. Key details are omitted, and the reality of the position does not align with what is initially presented. The inconsistency between the interview and the actual work environment feels misleading and contributes to preventable turnover. 5. Chronic Overstaffing and Unreliable Compensation: The business is routinely overstaffed, resulting in severely reduced hours and unpredictable income. Employees cannot rely on a stable schedule or consistent pay. The company uses a biweekly pay cycle—which is highly uncommon in bartending—and payroll errors are frequent. When mistakes occur, employees are required to wait an additional two weeks for correction. A typical two-week paycheck can average around $1,000, making it financially unsustainable for anyone relying on this job as their primary source of income. 6. Excessively Chaotic Communication Channels: The company’s reliance on WhatsApp leads to constant, excessive group messaging. The volume of notifications is overwhelming and reflects a lack of organized systems or streamlined internal communication practices. 7. Persistent Micromanagement and Boundary Violations: Micromanagement is prevalent, while role responsibilities remain unclear. Non-managerial staff often overstep boundaries by attempting to exert authority, creating confusion and unnecessary tension. This lack of structure undermines both workflow efficiency and team morale. 8. Reason for Departure: While there were a few individuals I appreciated working with, the overall environment was neither professional nor sustainable. Coming from a bar leadership position, it was concerning to be trained by individuals with minimal bartending experience while navigating constant conflict, disorganization, and negative energy. The workplace culture is overwhelmingly unstable, and employees struggle to find motivation or fulfillment. Ultimately, the stress, lack of structure, and absence of professional leadership made continued employment impossible.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 18 Reviews

Glassdoor has 18 Three Oaks Hospitality reviews submitted anonymously by Three Oaks Hospitality employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Three Oaks Hospitality is right for you.