Tradebot Reviews

3.6

57% would recommend to a friend

(37 total reviews)

Dave Cummings

50% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Tradebot has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 37 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Tradebot employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

37 reviews
3.0
23 Sept 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They are good to their employees. Great hours, catered lunch, casual work atmosphere. They don't pay Chicago or New York salaries but you can earn good money for KC.

Cons

The owner decided he has enough and has no interest in growth so it's tough to move up. The bonuses are very much an inverted pyramid so it's pretty frustrating to know you aren't going to move up because their isn't much opportunity for growth. The owner is the only person that can truly make decisions and his word is gospel so many good ideas are passed over and some pretty bad ones can get all the resources. It's run more like a family office than a business. They have absolutely no loyalty to their employees either. As soon as you're not valuable to them you are fired. Could be the first month after getting hired, could be after you've been there five years and they decide you're not good enough anymore.

2.0
19 Aug 2019

Kiss the ring

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If the lasting memory of a company is the "Free Lunches", that is a sad state. What were the pros, what made this more than a job, more than punching a clock? The people, ideas, innovation, and the speed our team could take napkin-math and turn it into real dollars in the most competitive markets in the World. Years of constantly sharpening our teeth on data, market participants, and sometimes each other. This was the life-blood of Tradebot and I unflinchingly devoted myself to the process: we all did. Any thought or observation could spark a deep-dive into complex multi-dimensional puzzles with no definitive answers. Multitudes of people living and breathing micro-market data, technology driven solutions, and creative ways to successfully implement their work into the broader markets. Project after project being scrutinized and picked-through by a well-oiled, well-capitalized team comprised of people with diverse mental-betas and life experiences. It was a special place. A special group. One I will remember fondly and selfishly as “My Dream Team.” We all had strengths to prop up our fellow Tradebotters’. An ideal team at the ideal time battling the ever-shifting sands of the US markets and winning.

Cons

Kiss the ring or pack your things! Consider Tradebot a high-tech boys club ran to entertain its owner as opposed to a cutting-edge trading firm looking to compete in the US equities or any other financial markets. Tradebot is a shell of what it once was. The pace of discovery, curiosity for new ideas, innovation, and freedom to constructively disagree have been thoroughly stamped out. Wait, how could there be such a dramatic change in the culture? From 2004 - 2014 Tradebot had non-owner CEOs. Those CEOs promoted permissionless-innovation, cross-team pollination, and empowered associates to grow the business based on the merit of an idea not a title. They believed the collective to be more powerful than the individual and Tradebot thrived. In 2014 the owner reclaimed the mantel of CEO. With this change seamless innovation, robust ideation and my personal dream team were vanquished. Teams now compete internally. Lines have been drawn in the sand, winners and losers have been chosen and communication has been stifled. The 7th floor of Briarcliff Tower, once teeming with fervor and excitement is now a boneyard of empty seats and monitors exposing gapping wounds of empty space and lost opportunity. If you want to know what you are getting into at Tradebot read The Founders Dilemma. Tradebot is a control driven organization now. Compared to a financial-driven organization between 2004 - 2014. The Board Member selections, pace of innovation, risk tolerance and whimsical macro-direction all support the “King classification” described in the paper.

1.0
4 Feb 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The free, hot, catered-in lunches were one of the few redeeming qualities about my time at Tradebot. I would also say that it looked like the Software Engineers did real, exciting programming work. Further, if you get to be a higher up, you'll be well compensated. Also, 20 vacation days is very generous starting out. That being said, you get no sick days, so unfortunately, this isn't that big of a plus.

Cons

As some of the more recent reviews note, this job definitely seems like more of a live action role-playing game at times, where your job is to appease and entertain an autocratic CEO with a penchant for firing people, as opposed to actually making real breakthroughs. To expound on this, as a researcher, I found that the CEO was afraid of new and bold ideas, and was severely skeptical of applied statistics. I was sold on the idea of joining a data-driven company, and frankly, I was disappointed from day one. The root of most of its issues is that Tradebot's power structure is entirely autocratic: the CEO is the judge, jury, and executioner. The culture used to encourage innovation, but then the CEO began to micromanage the company, stifling creativity and creating an atmosphere of distrust among and between the teams. Also, the benefits and compensation are SEVERELY lacking. Your health insurance will cost $300+/month for one person (it's ridiculously more for a family) and won't even be that great, you'll get a measly 3% IRA match, the dental program is a joke, you don't even get any sick days (although this is counterbalanced with a generous 20 vacation days), and most people felt like the bonuses were small in comparison to how much of an emphasis was placed on them at the times of our interviews and recruitment. Further, many at the company work 45-50 hour weeks, not the 40 hours you're told at recruitment. By the time you factor all this in, you're better off working at Cerner or Garmin if you're interested in software, or some other trading firm if you're interested in trading. Additionally, the work culture embodies the philosophy of high-frequency trading: take what you can get without giving back. Teams compete internally; people are reluctant to help you, because if they spend their time working on projects that don't make them look like an all-star, they won't get as big of a bonus, or worse, they'll get canned for no apparent reason. Even though the pay of a real trading firm isn't at Tradebot, the cutthroat mentality is. This leads me to my final point: the lack of any real job security. Employment is at will, meaning that the company can fire you and not even have a reason for it. This happens several times a year. They'll bring in a recent college grad, let them work a few months while they give them exclusively positive feedback, and then fire them without warning and without cause. It's not just new people, either. People who have put in years of work will also be fired, even if there's no performance or behavioral issues. If the CEO just wants to change things up, he will. Further, once you're canned, the 2 year non-compete agreement kicks in, meaning you can't work for another HFT firm. This makes Tradebot a terrible place to start a career. In sum, Tradebot used to be a wonderful place to work, but then it shifted towards an authoritarian power structure, and all innovation and creativity stopped and paranoia and internal competition thrived. Working at Tradebot is a zero-sum game, one which nobody is really winning.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 37 Reviews

Glassdoor has 43 Tradebot reviews submitted anonymously by Tradebot employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Tradebot is right for you.