Pros
- The office is located in an easily accessible place. - You rarely have to bring work home.
Cons
- There is no structure from the two founders. The leads are meant to come up with their own team structure, which means that if you get a manager who is not resourceful or a total micro-manager, you'll be stuck in the same role forever. Hence... - There is no growth in this company. There is no career path charted out, and when asked, HR also remained mum and avoided the question by saying please refer to your immediate superior. Which in the case of Con #1 means you're stuck forever. - the founders claim to be receptive to feedback. However when presented with constructive criticism, they end up turning around the points to make it about your failure and lack in performance rather than seeing the issues for what they are -- which is fundamentally, structural. - In my role, I have firsthand experience for how they manipulated their campaign reporting and reporting tools to deliver inflated performance numbers to their clients. This isn't the only type of numbers they've cooked up either... The lack of ethics don't seem to matter since they to drink from the PAP's teat and continue to get work of government campaigns. - The founders lack vision. They fire those with skill, keep those who are automatons, and consider those who challenge the status quo "toxic" when they're the ones who are truly toxic.