employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Westminster Forum Projects

Is this your company?

Westminster Forum Projects Reviews

1.7

4% would recommend to a friend

(126 total reviews)
avatar

Christopher Joseph WHITEHOUSE

Not enough data to show CEO approval

1% positive business outlook

Westminster Forum Projects has an employee rating of 1.7 out of 5 stars, based on 126 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The Westminster Forum Projects employee rating is 54% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

126 reviews
1.0
11 Feb 2022

Waste of time, depressing

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some other junior editorial assistants in the same boat were great. Leaving your desk to brew tea.

Cons

Where do I start? I was sold a lie. When offered the job I was told that I'd be doing research yet when it actually came down to it the only "research" one does is finding email addresses to spam. The work is mind-numbing and consists of emailing and phoning dozens of people a day, harassing them to attend conferences. That's it. Nothing more to it. If they don't reply immediately you're meant to keep badgering them until they tell you to get lost. Forgive me, but I don't like bothering people who clearly aren't interesting and speaking to you. If you want to burn all your bridges with the public and mindlessly copy-paste emails to random MPs then this is the job for you! Management was awful. Incredibly lazy and entitled. Constantly watching over your shoulder. They make you type up exactly what you did at the end of every day as though they weren't just watching you the entire time. Computers were incredibly slow! Perhaps this was a benefit because it took away time from email-bombing people. Abysmal pay. You're earning absolute pennies. Can't say I'm surprised since you're not actually doing anything of worth.

1.0
15 Sept 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a graduate, I did learn a lot about the world of work. My line manager was always friendly, interested in my life and understanding. Work from home is convenient.

Cons

There are so many issues with this company and other reviews detail these but to highlight a few: Volume of work: I feel like I can deal with a high work volume but this place is another story. Every night I would finish work having no where near finished the never ending to do list. They feel they can help support this by micromanaging your weeks, however this often confused me with what my priorities were and made me less productive. Naming and shaming culture: When you get behind on work (often due to above comments) instead of trying to support you, you are bombarded with rude emails by senior staff. Along side this multiple staff members are copied in to each and every email you send and receive, meaning everyone is aware when you are getting in ‘trouble’ or are behind on work. Feedback from senior staff: You will often get feedback on your work, Any feedback on your work was always very rude, harsh and frankly unproductive. It didn’t make sense. Comments short, sharp and used unnecessarily pedantic words. I used to get anxious at the thought of sending my work to be checked over. To quote some examples: after spending hours on a project of work and genuinely struggling with how to do it being told “I would expect things to be worked up properly before being chucked over to me” “this feels like a first draft” “this seems like a research-free process” “Slopping repeated wording” You can see, these comments are not productive or constructive and are made with a complete disregard of your feelings, time and effort that you have put into your work. By the end of my time there, after receiving harsh and long feedback on a first draft, I would change literally 5 words & the second draft would get approval. This proved to me that the incredibly harsh comments were being made purely for the sake of it and not actually a productive task. It is just so directors can get their anger out. Pay: Pay is unnecessarily low. The company made more my yearly salary in one event. Although I understand there are overheads, I can do the maths when I put on at least 2-3 events a month? The directors lavish holidays and second home in central London was the real slap in the face when I can barely afford my rent. Office days: You would think that office days would be fun, however these meetings uncomfortable as they appear to be more of a session for senior management to check up on you & scorn you for where you aren’t performing. To top it all off no directors said goodbye to me when I left, despite working very closely with me. Credit to other senior management and HR there, thanks for saying goodbye!

1.0
5 Aug 2023

Would rate negatively if I could

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Only two “pros” of working here have nothing to do with the actual role or the company. The people you work with really know their stuff and are all genuinely lovely people, willing to help you with anything if you need it, across the whole company. WFP definitely does seem to find the most knowledgeable staff to recruit. It did also provide some opportunities for networking (albeit very limited). There were occasions where you would consult with industry leaders and/or very influential people in their sector, although rarely without senior supervision, and I have kept in contact with a few of these people

Cons

The red flags began before I even started, with barely a 72hr turnaround from the invitation to interview to the job offer. I understand this is not necessarily all that abnormal in this age but given that I came out of the interview feeling it didn’t go as well as I’d hoped I thought it odd that they seemed desperate to drop other candidates and take me on ASAP. Upon starting, I was told I would not be given any equipment to work from home, despite the role being advertised as fully remote, and would instead be given software to download to my personal PC to work from a remote desktop. The software was horrendously outdated, and the servers, despite being upgraded during my time here, were abysmal, crashing at least once a day, making it impossible to complete any project as at least 80% of the work set required a solid internet connection. I was not given any training. I had a brief induction with about 5 other new starters (only 2 of us lasted longer than 3 weeks, they clearly had more sense that I!) where we were showed how to access the system then given a brief (and I mean brief – I was there almost a year and I still don’t know how to properly use it) introduction to the system to log our work and communications and that was it. This was an entry level role and you were just expected to know what to do from day 1. And if you didn’t, your managers are virtually unreachable and if things don’t get done to the correct standard (which you aren’t told what that standard is) you are publically shamed via email, with your entire team CC’d in. The worst part is you are micromanaged to hell. You need at least a degree to work here, and most of my colleagues had some form of post graduate education, so this is a team of competent adults, but we were treated like children! I had to email two line managers every time I logged in, went to and returned from lunch, and logged out. I was also expected to send over my daily workplan in the AM, and my completed tasks for the day when I logged out (side note – they tell you to keep to a 9-5 work day and not work into the evening, but it is very much an unspoken expectation to remain online until very late into the evening). It created a sense that you were not to leave your desk at all during the workday. The job was nothing like it was described to me – I was promised “exciting policy research”, but what I actually got was more cold calling than I did when I worked in an actual call centre at university. The work is dull, long and nothing as advertised, and the staff turnover is incredibly high – in my time there it felt there was someone leaving every week! And the pay! I understand this is an entry level job, but paying your graduate employees £21,500 while the head of the editorial team manages to own a second property in central London is, frankly, obscene. I lived around 2 hours away from where the monthly meetings were held in Bracknell, and was expected contractually to attend. Ok, fine, normal. But why, if I’m travelling to these meetings and I am expected to do so, are you refusing to even entertain the idea of mileage reimbursement? There were months where I was getting myself even further into crushing debt to pay for petrol and the obscene parking charges in central Bracknell, or god forbid a train ticket.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 126 Reviews

Glassdoor has 130 Westminster Forum Projects reviews submitted anonymously by Westminster Forum Projects employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Westminster Forum Projects is right for you.