Whatfix Software Development Engineer reviews

3.2

23% would recommend to a friend

(9 total reviews)
avatar

Khadim Batti

100% approve of CEO

23% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

9 reviews
4.0
21 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Learn and grow fast, flat hierarchy, product-driven culture

Cons

Extra work hours, some TLs are not supportive, unstructured fresher onboarding

avatar
Whatfix Response
2y
Thank you for acknowledging our growth culture and product-driven environment. We appreciate your insights on areas of improvement. Your feedback is valuable as we continue to foster a dynamic and supportive workplace. Wishing you continued success in your career.
4.0
19 Apr 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ample career opportunities for those who want to grow

Cons

Cannot think of any cons

avatar
Whatfix Response
3y
We appreciate your feedback.
1.0
1 Aug 2022

Not good

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) The company operates in a very niche domain of DAP and is one of the key players in this market. 2) The company's product idea is awesome. 3) People here are talented, hardworking and hustle a lot. 4) Management is transparent. 5) Pay is good.

Cons

1) The management has mandated employees to work from office full time, all 5 days a week. While this may be required for certain divisions such as Sales or customer facing teams, it is definitely not required for the Engineering team. The rationale for asking people to come to office all 5 days a week, especially for engineering folks, is not very clear and certainly not required. Plus, there is no transport facility either. 2) The company follows it's 'Hustle Mode On' culture very seriously. I have hustled a lot, but the kind of hustling Whatfix has, is on a whole new level, even for me. While this mode of working might suit some, it cannot be said as true for everybody. In fact, some introverted folks, find it very hard and draining, as the work demands lots of co-ordination with loads of people. There's a lot of ambiguity with the task at hand and information is concealed or unavailable and can be understood only through reaching out to other people and they in fact either ask us to reach out to some other people or ask a lot of counter questions. In the end, one is made to run from pillar to post in this maze of people. 3) Again, in relation to point 2, especially in engineering, no one seems to know the code base properly and only the few colleagues who somewhat know it, do not share their knowledge with others openly, thereby creating a dependency on them. There is not much documentation either and even if you find one, it is incomplete and outdated/incorrect and needs constant change. I've observed this happening in many teams in engineering. People who know something think that other people must figure out things for themselves and tend to sort of conceal information or at best talk in a jargon language that just goes above everyone's head. Expecting people to contribute without providing the necessary information or KT comes across as quite hostile. I feel that the reasons for such behavior are these - a) People who already know something can contribute significantly better than someone who doesn't know a great deal, and yes they do that. It hence helps them gain visibility and appreciation from the management. So they are not interested in sharing their knowledge and making things any easier for the juniors or the newly joined folks. Even experienced people struggle a lot due to this. b) Because they add value this way, their chances of getting promoted is much higher than someone who is still struggling to hustle amongst these very folks and understand the code base. c) The management also tends to incentivize such people and hence their behavior is justified and solidified. 4) There is a lot of work pressure here. Also, there is a concept of a success engineer, which is nothing but a developer who is put into production support on a rotational basis for a period of 2 or 3 weeks. The pressure on employees during this period is extremely high. So, to summarize, Whatfix does not come across as a good place to work. Instead, it comes across as a highly activitistic, but soul-lacking corporate.

avatar
Whatfix Response
3y
We really appreciate the detailed feedback. It wouldn't be ideal to respond to all of them here, so we would encourage you to please set up a 1-on-1 meeting with your HRBP and manager/BU head, and approach this together in a collaborative manner. We do accept the fact that there's room for improvement when it comes to curating and maintaining reusable documentation, especially as we scale up. This is something that's been kickstarted as a high-priority project by the HR team in collaboration with the Engineering Leads and we would strongly urge you to participate in it and work with us on solving it together. Thanks again for such a well thought out and constructive feedback.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 9 Reviews

Glassdoor has 758 Whatfix reviews submitted anonymously by Whatfix employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Whatfix is right for you.