Zymergen Reviews

3.0

41% would recommend to a friend

(241 total reviews)
avatar

Joshua Hoffman

24% approve of CEO

16% positive business outlook

Zymergen has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 241 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Zymergen employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

241 reviews
2.0
23 May 2020

Way past its prime

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending on the team you are on, there are some amazingly fantastic/fun/kind/smart managers and co-workers, and the work can be fairly interesting/compelling/challenging/exciting The aspiration of creating bio-derived products and reducing the carbon footprint of various industries through more efficient production strains is admirable and important.

Cons

Management is generally delusional about the state and trajectory of the business. It's very hard to get straight, transparent answers about strategic direction, project prioritization, and financial health of the company. Especially from the CEO. Egos have been inflated by the relationship with softbank. Very low revenue achieved compared to targets for the last 5 years running. Coupled with an enormous burn rate, this has now resulted in the first wave of layoffs in May 2020. More to come? Who knows? Management seems to be now at the mercy of the board and the fundraising market. Unclear how the history with Softbank will affect ability to raise funds moving forward. Revenue outlook for 2021/2022 not great. The business has a very corporate/process-heavy, slow moving feel to it. The company feels much larger than it actually is. All the stresses of an early stage startup financially speaking, all the bureaucracy of a large corporation. Strange combination. A weird trend of members of upper management giving 0 day notice and quitting. Not sure why this has happened multiple times over the last year. Execs and marketing team claims this is a completely 'biology-first' business. Would be great if they fully lived up to. Company still falls back on chemical synthesis as opposed to biology-derived products in certain cases. This company is likely to become similar to Amyris in years to come.....poor financials, constant dilution, some semi-compelling bio-derived products on the market, but constantly treading water to stay afloat. Definitely not the 'google of synthetic biology'. Numerous programs have been cut in recent months - generally widespread inability to deliver on milestones across the portfolio. Less scientific rigor compared to other biotechs I've worked at. Don't get me wrong, there are a good number of AMAZING scientists here, but overall as a company, this is ~ B+ science. Company has a very silicon valley feel to it - a bit inflated and disconnected from the laws of physics. Though...very good decision to acquire Enevolv (it was absolutely needed) - this may change things a bit, but will take a year or so to tell. I do wish Zymergen all the best of luck. The company unfortunately just took on some bad contracts and heavily mismanaged the growth potential. It will no doubt be a very shaky 1-2 years ahead, but I think there will be a path forward in the longer term.

1.0
13 Oct 2017

Oligarchy culture will turn this place toxic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company has a good vision. I imagine it'd be an exciting place to work if you're in the department with resources and not in the department that's spit on.

Cons

Sure, the company's new, but old enough to already sow the seeds of a toxic environment. Forget about having the basics to perform your job, or even basic respect, if you aren't in research. The attitude that if a Scientist asks you to jump off the bridge, your response must be, "golden gate or bay bridge?" comes from the executive level, so I don't see this culture changing. REF has had half a dozen reported injuries and probably another 6 that haven't been reported, because nothing comes from them. Nobody cares. No changes have been made. A stupid safety powerpoint at all hands doesn't cut it as a response to all of our injuries. ALL software is designed for scientists. Any software implemented in Lab Ops only makes our jobs harder/ more complicated/ adds redundancies. We've asked for software support and have basically been laughed at. I hear others have been hired to do a job function, but aren't given the tools they need to do their jobs. Let's not mention that an RA I has the SAME BACKGROUND/ JOB REQUIREMENTS as a Tech I (bio degree, lab experience), but one is exempt with unlimited vacation while the other is not with a WAAAY lower salary. We aren't learning anything in our positions and have no room grow.

2.0
6 June 2018

Not a place to build a career

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some very smart people work here. Benefits are somewhat decent. They have pantries and free food. The company is innovative and true visionaries.

Cons

I dont see myself here long term. I haven’t learned anything new, I haven’t grown, and I don’t think they will be effective in changing the absentee leadership here. Managers and senior managers are all Professional Survivors and NOT effective in people management. They are toxic, bringing the culture down, and not effective in their roles. “Training”is a laughabale resolution. How are you going to benchmark if training is working? How are you pinpointing ineffective leaders to work on? G and A has lost multiple good people in a span of a month and nothing is happening to keep talent. Unfortunately the ineffective managers stick around 🙄

Viewing 1 - 3 of 241 Reviews

Glassdoor has 255 Zymergen reviews submitted anonymously by Zymergen employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Zymergen is right for you.