dsk architects Reviews

3.5

65% would recommend to a friend

(5 total reviews)

Amir Kakavand & Mark Seiberlich

100% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

5 reviews
2.0
8 July 2015

Lot of potential

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is potential to this firm to be great but they become more of boys club. Area near Twitter becoming better and cleaner.

Cons

If you stuck drafting then that will all you be. Need more opportunity for women to advance. Small office is less professional which not good excuse.

2.0
22 Dec 2014

Small company culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They are a small company which means lots of opportunity to learn beyond just technical architecture duties. It is close to Public transportation hubs.

Cons

With being a small company, there is a lot left to be desired in terms of professionalism. The grammar/spelling on a lot of their marketing materials needs to be vetted through professional writers. There is a temdency to cross the "line" sometimes but it is very informal. The location is in a sketchy part of the Civic Center but maybe it will improve in a few years. Typical small company benefits. They are struggling to break into substantial health care work with a portfolio of mostly type B and small university work.

5.0
7 Nov 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

▪ Generous PTO which is great: 15 PTO + 12 off days + 7 Holidays = 34 work days/yr = nearly 7 weeks. ▪ Flexible work schedule to accommodate those avoiding traffic. ▪ Fair compensation and reasonable work hours. They understand work/life balance and generally avoid asking for overtime. ▪ Principals are good, kind, fair people. Sometimes things get heated, but it is within reason, especially when problems arise and the project manager leaves town. ▪ Growth potential in climbing the corporate albeit small ladder. It's a small company, so there not a lot of people "ahead" of you. Good work is genuinely appreciated, although not necessarily monetarily awarded. As opposed to more established larger firms, where you have to fight to get recognition. Think of yourself at dsk as a big fish in a small pond. ▪ Staff are exposed to the full gamut of architectural services from SD to CA. Junior staff are exposed to architect/client relations early on and are encouraged to attend client meetings. ▪ Principals are open minded and do take suggestions to heart and try to implement the requests that are reasonable. ▪ Lots of projects coming down the pipe.

Cons

▪ Management tends to switch staff around project deadlines, rather than keeping consistent team members, which creates difficulty for project managers to track tasks among junior staff, and inability to hold anyone accountable due to the constant flux. ▪ The partners tend to underestimate the time required to complete tasks, especially those in new territory, and over estimate the power of BIM/Revit. ▪ Office is located in an up and coming area of SOMA, however space is tight and feels small. ▪ Some of the consultants hired are great, some are not proactive enough, some are just not responsive. Not sure why the inconsistency and it does get frustrating when you have to start doing the work for them. ▪ Bonuses are small and only once per year. A bit demotivating when you are working hard all year.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 5 Reviews

Glassdoor has 7 dsk architects reviews submitted anonymously by dsk architects employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if dsk architects is right for you.