The interview process was very unprofessional.
First, I passed the first CV screening and an initial phone interview with HR.
Second, I passed a short technical assignment.
The third step was a call interview about answering theoretical questions about architecture, language foundations and best practices. The discussion was supposed to be open and two-way between the interviewer, but the interviewer did not engage into any discussion and he kept giving very generic questions like "tell me about testing" "tell me about architecture" . I answered them with as many details as possible. The interviewer did not show any disagreement with the answers and he never replied to them back. He took many notes while I was answering but in the end I did not see how well he wrote them. Sometimes it felt like he could not catch up
After a couple of days I received a rejection that those answers were not enough, without any more detail on which were wrong.
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience and I'm sorry to hear it was a poor one. I'd love to dig into this for you, make it up to you and get you that feedback - would you mind dropping me a note? jamie.edwards+glassdoor@deliveroo.co.uk - Jamie
Other Senior Software Engineer interview reviews for Deliveroo
2 coding tests (Online test and take home assignment)
3 round interviews (HR screen, Coding Review, System Design)
My last stage is the System Design interview
After the process, they sent me a review
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Deliveroo in Oct 2025
Interview
Here's a professional expansion:
**Interview Process Experience:**
The process began with a recruiter screen where I engaged positively, acknowledging the recruiter's role in connecting candidates with opportunities. Shortly after, I received an online coding assessment—a standard but telling practice that increasingly signals companies offloading evaluation effort onto candidates' time without reciprocal investment.
**Reflection**: Online tests have become a filtering mechanism that extracts significant energy from job seekers while requiring minimal company resources. For someone with years of proven production experience, certifications, and a track record of delivering measurable impact, these generic assessments rarely capture actual capability or cultural fit. They often favor those who optimize for test-taking over those who excel at building real systems.
This approach suggests a transactional hiring philosophy rather than a genuine evaluation of senior engineering talent. Strong companies invest time upfront in meaningful technical conversations that assess judgment, architectural thinking, and collaboration—not algorithmic puzzle-solving under artificial constraints.
**Takeaway**: I'm seeking organizations that value demonstrated experience and engage candidates as professionals, not as interchangeable test-takers in a volume-driven pipeline.
I interviewed at Deliveroo (London, England) in Nov 2025
Interview
The process took so long, and I feel like I just lost my time.
I had to go through this process for a month, and by the end, I did not receive feedback.
1. Hr Call.
2. Take-home programming test
3.1 Take-home programming test followed by a pair programming test to review the code
3.2 System design. The recruiter told me it would be the same System design interview as always, but they asked me to design something different from what they had asked before.
3.3 Behaviour Interview.
I don't know what Deliveroo wants. All my interviews were positive, but the hiring committee decided not continue with the process. I didn't receive a feedback email saying what happened
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Same programming take-home test
The system design interview was different from what it used to be
Behavioural about leadership